What Stood Out In My Evaluation

Some years again, I witnessed a magnanimous safety breach of a trademarked firm web site in my earlier firm, which left the IT group frozen in shock.

Had the risk been detected or analyzed earlier, a correct risk detection and mitigation framework might need prevented the mishap.

It additionally intrigued me to have some talks over tea with my firm’s community engineers and cybersecurity analysts to get intel on the options or advantages they search from the greatest risk intelligence instruments at present.

With their insights, I observed the demand for multi-source information aggregation to create and correlate threats, real-time risk detection and monitoring, automation, AI-driven information privateness, and contextual risk intelligence, that are key options in risk intelligence instruments that may forestall disastrous outcomes.

With this define, I sought to research and consider 7 greatest risk intelligence instruments available in the market at present to create and co-relate threats, analyze and mitigate safety dangers and scale back the dependency on handbook groups to extract risk histories and causes. Let’s get into it!

7 greatest risk intelligence instruments: my prime picks

A risk intelligence instrument protects and safeguards a corporation in opposition to numerous safety dangers, similar to cyber assaults, brute power assaults, zero-day assaults, and zero-day vulnerabilities. Once I began evaluating risk intelligence instruments, my main focus was on which instruments are fitted with the newest safety protocols to take care of robust encryption requirements for a corporation’s information and supply real-time risk detection.

Whereas evaluating and researching, I famous key parameters {that a} safety group searches for, similar to the necessity to accumulate and correlate risk information from numerous sources, together with open supply intelligence (OSINT), business feeds, and inside logs. Patrons additionally search instruments that provide AI-based automation for risk evaluation and contextual risk intelligence to detect ways, strategies, and procedures relating to threats. Whereas risk intelligence instruments establish vulnerabilities, ERM options guarantee these insights feed into company-wide resilience.

My evaluation covers the highest 7 risk intelligence instruments available in the market, which provide sturdy safety frameworks to fight any danger of unwarranted threats.

What makes a risk intelligence instrument value it: my opinion 

My evaluation had a singleton conclusion; a instrument that identifies clever patterns of AI-powered cyberattacks or information breaches and alerts the system about potential threats or safety warnings is a perfect risk intelligence instrument.

In keeping with Markets and Markets, the risk intelligence market was estimated at USD 11.55 billion in 2025 and is projected to achieve USD 22.97 billion by 2030, at a CAGR of 14.7% in the course of the forecast interval. 

Additional, these techniques combine with SIEM instruments, antivirus instruments, and endpoint detection instruments to strengthen the safety posture and establish and mitigate threats sooner.

With a powerful deal with safety and privateness, I recognized the next essential options that you must look out for in a risk intelligence instrument. 

• Automated risk information aggregation and normalization: Once I assess any risk intelligence instrument, the very first thing I guarantee is that it could create and correlate risk information from a number of sources like OSINT, inside logs, and business feeds. This was an important step in contextualizing threats and standardizing risk patterns for quicker evaluation and real-time detection. With out aggregation and normalization, risk information stays chaotic and virtually unusable. A very good instrument unifies this info and saves analysts numerous handbook hours of labor.
• Contextualized risk enrichment: I additionally thought-about which instruments contextualized threats along with sending an alert or warning within the system. A robust risk enrichment module is essential to forecasting and mitigating the risk. The platform should layer important metadata, similar to attacker ways (MITRE ATT&CK), industries focused, and malware households used, so that you just aren’t simply seeing what the risk is but in addition why it issues to them particularly. Instruments that fail to do that go away customers flying blind.
• Actual-time risk detection and alerting: Clever snoopers or attackers create new infiltration patterns each second. Which is why a risk intelligence instrument must be powered with real-time detection and actionable alerting. Whether or not by way of integrations with SIEMs, SOARs, or standalone dashboards, these instruments ought to struggle AI-powered attacking mechanisms with tight protection mitigation methods. With real-time risk detection, you may transfer and react at machine velocity and never with a “next-business-day” nature. Alongside risk feeds and enrichment, many organizations depend on prime MDR companies to actively monitor, detect, and reply to evolving assaults. 
• Tailor-made intelligence to your business and danger profile: In my analysis, these instruments are deemed greatest as a result of they allow you to customise risk feeds and intelligence primarily based in your business, geography, digital footprint, and particular danger urge for food. Customization ensures that the group will get related, actionable insights and never a truckload of irrelevant alerts with no measurement of danger depth.
• Risk investigation and deep dive analytics module: These instruments wanted to be outfitted with a complicated analytics dashboard to show risk instances, risk sources, and risk mitigation information. They even have investigation workbenches the place you may pivot between risk indicators, discover assault paths, enrich IPs and domains, and join dots throughout campaigns. Investigative agility makes the distinction between reactive defence and proactive searching. 
• Collaboration, sharing, and reporting capabilities: In a contemporary safety ecosystem, no group operates alone. That is why I shortlisted instruments which have built-in mechanisms for sharing intelligence with inside or exterior groups, organizations, and even ISACs and nationwide cyber alliances to type a strong safety infrastructure. Equally essential is automated and customizable reporting in order that safety groups can simply talk danger and impression to management and non-technical stakeholders.

All of it boils all the way down to how a risk intelligence instrument creates risk information, contextualizes threats with forecasting, and catches maintain of good AI-based breaches to set off risk alerts and protection methods to counter dangers.

Instruments that stood out when it comes to buyer satisfaction, buyer section, and G2 sentiment scoring are the highest risk intelligence instrument contenders on this listing since they’re primarily based on real-time G2 consumer evaluation information.

Out of 30+ greatest risk intelligence instruments that I evaluated, the highest 7 have made it to this listing. The listing under comprises real evaluations from the risk intelligence class web page. To be included on this class, a software program should:

• Present info on rising threats and vulnerabilities.
• Element remediation practices for frequent and rising threats.
• Analyze world threats on various kinds of networks and gadgets 
• Cater risk info to particular IT options.

*This information was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some evaluations might have been edited for readability.  

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a cloud native endpoint detection and utility safety platform that retains your safety techniques updated and defends your on-prem or cloud information in opposition to unwarranted assaults or breaches.

As a class chief on G2 primarily based on 127 verified evaluations, Microsoft Defender for Cloud has an total buyer satisfaction rating of 72, and 90% of customers are more likely to advocate it to others. 

What instantly impressed me was how straightforward it was to combine with my present Azure setup. The preliminary deployment was principally clean; no further configuration is required until you are going deep into hybrid or multi-cloud environments.

It simply clicked with Azure companies, Microsoft 365, and even AWS and GCP, which was a nice shock. Additionally they have a pay-as-you-go subscription mannequin that feels versatile in case you are not prepared for an enormous dedication upfront.

One of many first issues that stood out was the safety rating dashboard. It is like a real-time report card to your cloud posture that highlights vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and dangerous sources. I cherished how detailed it was, breaking down particular person sources inside every subscription and giving clear suggestions for fixing points. 

Typically, in case you are fortunate, you may even simply click on “Repair” and it auto-remediates. That saved me a bunch of time. Plus, the mixing with Azure Energetic Listing made identification safety tremendous clean.

The distinction between tiers in premium options was fairly noticeable. The free tier offers you fundamentals like safety assessments, suggestions, and coverage administration. Actually, that is sufficient to get you began.

However as soon as I upgraded to the usual plan, issues received just a little extra highly effective. I received entry to just-in-time VM entry, adaptive utility controls, and community risk detection. The just-in-time entry function is a lifesaver if you happen to work with VMs and want to cut back publicity with out manually shutting issues on and off on a regular basis.

Additionally, there’s one other function generally known as Defender for Servers, a premium plan that shocked me with options like file integrity monitoring (it alerts on file adjustments, however typically misses the context of potential malicious exercise). It will be even higher if they may proactively flag behaviours as a substitute of simply logging adjustments.

I additionally need to point out their assist for risk safety, real-time detection, AI-based risk analytics, anti-malware, and anti-phishing. It is particularly nice at monitoring e-mail threats, with whitelisting choices that allow you to shield trusted distributors.

Plus, the multi-cloud safety protection is not simply Azure-exclusive; it expands throughout AWS and GCP, providing insights and proposals tailor-made to every cloud.

In keeping with G2 consumer evaluations, Microsoft Defender for Cloud is acknowledged for robust multi-cloud safety, although complexity is a recurring theme. Organising superior options or third-party integrations can take time, and a few customers point out occasional false positives that add noise to alerts.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is round pricing and value. Superior protections are sometimes tied to higher-tier plans, which can really feel steep for smaller companies. The interface additionally evolves shortly, and whereas highly effective, frequent adjustments could make navigation much less intuitive.

General, G2 sentiment displays Microsoft Defender for Cloud as a dependable and sturdy answer for safeguarding information and monitoring safety postures throughout hybrid and multi-cloud environments.

What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

• Though the instrument gives endpoint safety for all gadgets, the deployment course of may be very complicated when configuring safety for iOS gadgets. 
• One other gripe I discovered was the pricing. It might probably shortly turn out to be costly, and the overload of alerts results in false positives. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

“What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud is the complicated pricing, which may shortly turn out to be costly, and the overload of alerts, usually resulting in false positives. Moreover, the mukti-cloud assist is not as sturdy for non-azure platforms; the preliminary setups might be sophisticated for groups with out cloud safety setup expertise.”

– Microsoft Defender for Cloud Evaluate, Archi P.

Recorded Future gives an entire breakdown of real-time safety breaches or threats, initiates risk mitigation practices, and protects your safety firewall in opposition to snoops or spies.

As a class chief in risk intelligence software program, Recorded Future has achieved an eloquent buyer satisfaction rating of 97, primarily based on 109 evaluations. Round 92% of customers will advocate Recorded Future for intelligence stories, sandboxing, and proactive alerts.

What actually hooked me from the start was how quick and clever it felt—like having an analyst group operating 24/7, continually feeding me actionable risk insights. It is not simply information dumped from random sources. Recorded Future curates risk intelligence from a powerful mixture of open net, darkish net, closed boards, and technical telemetry, and someway, all of it is smart.

I can belief the alerts I obtain as a result of they don’t seem to be solely real-time but in addition prioritized primarily based on relevance and impression.

I additionally appreciated the fusion of machine velocity assortment with human-curated evaluation. It means I do not simply get the automated noise; I get contextual and enriched intelligence that I can work on.

This mixture actually helps our proactive, intelligence-driven safety operations. The integration with SIEMs and SOAR platforms makes life simpler, too, as the whole lot plugs in seamlessly with out having to create workarounds.

I additionally respect the myriad of options, like their super-detailed risk maps, danger scores, and entity profiles. If you’re in an enormous group, the premium options in upper-tier subscriptions supply much more superior modules like assault floor monitoring, model safety, and geopolitical intelligence. 

Some plans additionally include analyst-on-demand companies, which is nice after I want professional validation for a fast strategic seek the advice of and recommendation. 

In keeping with G2 consumer evaluations, Recorded Future is revered for its breadth of risk intelligence, although the interface can really feel overwhelming at first. With a lot information flowing in, customers be aware the significance of tuning alerts and filters to keep away from being overloaded.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is round pricing and have entry. The transfer to a modular mannequin gives flexibility, however superior capabilities like fraud detection or nation-state monitoring are sometimes tied to premium tiers, which may really feel restrictive for smaller safety groups.

General, G2 sentiment displays Recorded Future as a proactive and intelligence-rich platform that empowers safety groups to detect, analyze, and mitigate threats in actual time.

What I dislike about Recorded Future:

• Whereas Recorded Future presents an entire package deal, it comes with a value. I observed that the superior tier plans require you to pay a hefty quantity. Additionally, it is advisable pay for every additional API integration, so the licensing mannequin is dear.
• I additionally discovered that whereas the platform is highly effective, it may be difficult for brand spanking new customers to make the most of and work with it with out in depth coaching. The educational curve is steep, significantly for superior options like question builder and integrations.

What do G2 customers dislike about Recorded Future:

“The recorded future has so many alternative modules that it may be a bit obscure what capabilities my group does and doesn’t have entry to.”

– Recorded Future Evaluate, Tyler C.

Cyberint is an end-to-end cyber intelligence platform that enables corporations to detect, analyze, and examine unwarranted actions and cyber threats earlier than they adversely impression the general privateness community.

Primarily based on 102 verified G2 evaluations, Cyberint has achieved a satisfaction rating of 97, making it a class chief. Additionally, round 93% of customers within the total enterprise section, consisting of small, mid, and enterprise corporations, are more likely to advocate Cyberint to others.

I’ve been exploring Cyberint’s Argos Risk Intelligence Platform for fairly a while, and I’ve to say that it’s a blended bag. What actually drew me in at first was how intuitive and user-friendly the interface is. It would not bombard you with jargon or overcomplicated workflows, which is strictly what’s essential when integrating it together with your safety operations.

The instrument’s safety framework was accomplished by real-time risk detection and assault floor monitoring. Inside days, Argos helped our group establish and reply to darkish net threats and model impersonations we did not even know existed.

I additionally appreciated their customizable alert system. Every alert is tagged with the respective risk sort—be it fishing, credential leaks, uncovered belongings, or suspicious mentions on illicit boards.

The platform would not simply throw information at you; it contextualizes it. We significantly benefited from their darkish net intelligence and deep visibility into risk actors’ ways, strategies, and procedures (TTPs). It felt like having a 24/7 risk hunter embedded in our group.

A function I’ve come to depend on closely is Argo’s third-party danger monitoring, which checks for vulnerabilities throughout our vendor ecosystem. This type of foresight has saved us a number of instances from potential publicity. The model safety module is top-notch. It actively screens social media, rogue domains, and pretend apps impersonating our enterprise. Actually, it’s one of the vital full suites I’ve seen in a risk intelligence platform.

In keeping with G2 consumer evaluations, Cyberint earns reward for its risk intelligence protection, although some customers discover the API much less mature than anticipated. Integrating into broader SOAR pipelines can really feel restricted, and customization of dashboards and stories doesn’t all the time present the flexibleness groups need.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is round workflow friction and have depth. Copying or sharing visible information like risk graphs isn’t seamless, and some reviewers point out occasional false positives the place filtering and suggestions may very well be smoother. Some superior capabilities additionally seem tied to higher-tier plans, which isn’t all the time clearly communicated.

General, G2 sentiment displays Cyberint as a complete digital danger safety answer that helps organizations monitor, detect, and defend in opposition to exterior threats with robust protection and premium-tier assist.

What I dislike about Cyberint:

• Whereas Cyberint gives end-to-end alerts about energetic assaults, it is advisable manually replace the standing of alerts, even if in case you have completed so by way of a SIEM system.
• I additionally observed some minor UI bugs, like alerts not opening in a brand new web page when urgent Ctrl+click on. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Cyberint:

The answer has options that appear to have redundant performance, however nonetheless, such performance continues to be useful to a corporation.

One other factor is that the extra options could be a bit regarding when it comes to the group’s funds. However, if such a burden might be dealt with, I totally assist having this answer in case you are in search of a cyber risk intelligence answer

– Cyberint Evaluate, Gen Hart B.

Crowdstrike Falcon gives anti-ransomware options to take care of safety benchmarks throughout all of your community gadgets and tech stack. It covers incidents, vulnerabilities, assaults, and malware detection beneath its belt.

Primarily based on 130+ verified evaluations on G2, CrowdStrike Falcon has achieved a buyer satisfaction ranking of 76, with over 94% customers prepared to advocate it to others for malware detection, safety validation, and endpoint intelligence.

What instantly stood out to me was how light-weight it’s. It doesn’t lavatory down system efficiency like some older-gen antivirus instruments do. The setup was refreshingly straightforward, too. I used to be in a position to deploy it throughout endpoints with minimal friction, and the unified agent structure meant I didn’t need to juggle a number of installs for various modules.

Considered one of its superpowers is real-time risk detection. CrowdStrike’s cloud-native structure leverages behavioral analytics and AI-based risk intelligence to proactively detect anomalies like ransomware, fileless malware, zero-day assaults, and extra.

I used to be additionally impressed with how briskly it reacts. The Falcon Forestall module (included even within the base plan) already outperforms many conventional AVs, however as quickly as I added Falcon Perception for EDR, I actually noticed the ability of real-time telemetry and investigation. The extent of element it gives is like having a magnifying glass into your community exercise.

What I additionally respect is the single-agent method. I didn’t need to overload machines with totally different endpoint instruments. Whether or not it was vulnerability administration by way of Falcon Highlight, risk searching by way of Falcon OverWatch, or system management, the whole lot built-in seamlessly.

Should you go for higher-tier plans like Falcon Enterprise or Falcon Full, you additionally get 24/7 managed risk searching, which, let’s be sincere, is a game-changer when your group is small or overworked. These guys virtually turn out to be your SOC extension.

In keeping with G2 consumer evaluations, CrowdStrike Falcon is praised for its robust detection and endpoint safety, although pricing is commonly talked about as a barrier. Smaller companies, particularly, be aware that the modular pricing construction can really feel costly as wants increase.

One other theme in G2 suggestions pertains to assist and value. Whereas many interactions with assist are optimistic, ticket resolutions can sometimes take longer than anticipated. Just a few reviewers additionally point out false positives and be aware that the Falcon console, whereas highly effective, comes with a studying curve for brand spanking new customers.

General, G2 sentiment displays CrowdStrike Falcon as a market-leading endpoint safety answer that delivers broad protection and superior detection capabilities.

What I dislike about CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Safety Platform:

• Though it does an awesome job of offering alerts and updates, we can’t go into a lot element once we choose the sensor from the system tray.
• I additionally observed that there are lots of screens to handle, it’s laborious to achieve each function, and there’s a want to know computer systems at a excessive degree.

What do G2 customers dislike about CrowdStrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform:

“I am not glad with the pricing in comparison with another alternate options, that are just a little bit larger, and it has restricted cell assist.”

– Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform Evaluate, Bhavanasi N.

Mimecast Superior E-mail Safety gives AI-powered information safety in opposition to email-borne and harmful assaults. It leverages machine studying and social graphing to detect threats in real-time.

Primarily based on 120 verified evaluations on G2, Mimecast has achieved a mean buyer satisfaction rating of 70, with 90% customers prepared to advocate it to others for e-mail safety, e-mail safety, and safe e-mail gateway. 

Mimecast is a instrument that runs quietly within the background, shielding organizations from phishing, malware, spoofing, and impersonation makes an attempt. It hardly ever lets something malicious slip by way of.

The AI-driven safety is legit, I’ve seen it catch some extremely refined impersonation makes an attempt, particularly these difficult CEO fraud-style emails that used to fly beneath the radar.

Considered one of my favourite options is its real-time hyperlink and attachment scanning. When an e-mail hits your inbox, Mimecast doesn’t simply let it move by way of. It actively scans the whole lot embedded within the message. The e-mail continuity function additionally proves useful. Throughout service outages, Mimecast retains e-mail visitors flowing in order that communication would not cease.

I additionally appreciated the admin dashboard, which is stacked with capabilities. Initially, it felt a bit overwhelming, however type of thrilling. When you get previous the preliminary curve, although, it turns into a robust management middle.

You may configure insurance policies all the way down to the smallest element, set granular filtering guidelines, and simply entry logs and risk stories. I particularly respect the e-mail archiving and e-discovery instruments. They’re clear, searchable, and make regulatory compliance easy.

In keeping with G2 consumer evaluations, Mimecast is revered for its robust e-mail safety, although false positives are typically talked about as a disadvantage. Just a few customers be aware that legit messages might be flagged as suspicious, and the method of manually whitelisting them isn’t all the time as clean because it may very well be.

One other theme in G2 suggestions pertains to coverage configuration. Organising superior insurance policies can take trial and error, and a few reviewers point out intermittent login points throughout administration.

General, G2 sentiment displays Mimecast as a scalable and dependable e-mail safety answer that delivers robust safety and encryption for organizations dealing with massive volumes of important communications.

What I dislike about Mimecast Superior E-mail Safety

• Though Mimecast detects any presence of phishing makes an attempt or malware in emails, it may be a bit aggressive with filtering, resulting in false positives that require handbook evaluation.
• One other factor I observed is that Mimecast typically flags legit emails as suspicious, resulting in communication delays.

What do G2 customers dislike about Mimecast Superior E-mail Safety:

The draw back is that the assist is just a little off-putting in case you are previous your implementation part. Among the guidelines and insurance policies are laborious to configure by way of implementation.

– Mimecast Superior E-mail Safety Evaluate, Jessica C.

ThreatLocker is a good instrument for detecting and capturing undesirable exercise throughout your safety community. It gives a suite of cybersecurity instruments to scale your information and content material safety workflows and scale back the chance of knowledge breaches or vulnerabilities.

Primarily based on 86 verified evaluations, ThreatLocker has a good buyer satisfaction common of 91, making it a pacesetter within the class. Additional, a whopping 97% customers will advocate it to others for intelligence stories, sandboxing, and proactive alerts.

I’ve explored a number of safety instruments earlier than, however ThreatLocker stands out, principally as a result of it does what it guarantees. From the start, it was clear that this wasn’t a primary antivirus or general-purpose instrument. It is constructed particularly to implement zero belief on the utility degree.

The core function, utility whitelisting, signifies that solely software program we’ve explicitly authorized can run. It offers us instant visibility into unauthorized applications and, in lots of instances, stops potential threats earlier than they even begin.

One other function I exploit closely is Ringfencing. It’s not nearly what apps can run but in addition about what they’re allowed to work together with. For instance, I can cease a trusted utility like Microsoft Phrase from launching PowerShell or accessing delicate information directories. This degree of segmentation has helped us forestall lateral motion and limit how even authorized instruments can behave.

ThreatLocker’s assist group has been one of the vital dependable features of the expertise. Any time we hit a configuration problem or wanted steering, they had been fast to reply and useful all through. That degree of assist made an actual distinction, particularly within the early days once we had been nonetheless determining learn how to construction insurance policies successfully.

In keeping with G2 consumer evaluations, ThreatLocker is praised for its granular management, although the training curve might be important. Organising insurance policies requires time and a focus, as customers must steadiness blocking threats with out limiting legit exercise.

One other theme in G2 suggestions is the quick tempo of updates. Whereas frequent enhancements present the product is evolving, documentation can lag behind, leaving groups to regulate and relearn options extra usually than anticipated.

General, G2 sentiment displays ThreatLocker as a robust safety platform that delivers robust coverage enforcement, privilege administration, and compliance-focused auditing.

What I dislike about ThreatLocker:

• Whereas Threatlocker empowers you to enhance your zero-trust method and privileges, it takes a while to fine-tune insurance policies, particularly to start with, and managing approvals could be a little bit of a studying curve.
• Whereas Threatlocker is a sturdy safety instrument, the general studying curve can be steep for customers who are usually not conversant in its interface and sophisticated configurations.

What do G2 customers dislike about ThreatLocker:

“It is not a draw back, however ThreatLocker requires time & sources to totally perceive the product and supply superb assist to your clients. It is not a click on and deploy and by no means take a look at it once more product. That mentioned, we spend possibly 1-2 hours every week reviewing approval requests after the preliminary rollout.”

– ThreatLocker Evaluate, Jonathan G. 

CloudSEK is an AI-powered risk intelligence instrument that detects cyber threats, extends safety protection to cloud databases, and screens any suspicious exercise from a centralized platform to enhance information protection mechanisms.

Primarily based on 50+ verified G2, CloudSEK achieved a mean satisfaction rating of 88, with 97% customers prepared to advocate it to others for proactive alerts, deployment, and safety validation. 

The very first thing that caught my eye was the dashboard. It’s extremely intuitive and neatly laid out, making it straightforward to get a complete snapshot of your risk panorama with out drowning in noise.

All the things from model monitoring to VIP safety and digital danger monitoring is introduced in a method that simply is smart. I discovered it tremendous helpful to have all these modules tightly built-in; it gave me an entire image of our digital publicity with minimal effort.

What I like most about CloudSEK is its proactive method. The platform would not simply provide you with a warning about present threats; it additionally surfaces rising dangers earlier than they escalate. That is an enormous step if you find yourself attempting to stay one step forward of adversaries.

As an example, their risk actor profiling and context-rich incident summaries actually helped me perceive not simply the “what”, but in addition the “who” and “why” behind every alert. Plus, their bulk closure function for incidents is an absolute time saver, particularly if you find yourself coping with recurring or false-positive-prone alerts. 

In keeping with G2 consumer evaluations, CloudSEK is valued for its fast deployment and robust danger monitoring, although false positives are sometimes famous. The detection engine could be a bit aggressive, requiring upfront fine-tuning of alert guidelines to keep away from pointless escalations.

One other theme in G2 suggestions pertains to customization and automation. Creating new guidelines or workflows can really feel extra inflexible in comparison with different platforms, and whereas API integrations exist, documentation isn’t all the time as sturdy as customers count on.

General, G2 sentiment displays CloudSEK as an accessible and scalable platform that delivers complete digital danger monitoring and model safety throughout net, deep net, and darkish net sources.

What I dislike about CloudSEK:

• Though CloudSEK presents real-time risk alerts, the variety of false positives is alarming when the alert rule just isn’t tuned correctly.
• I additionally observed the sheer quantity of alerts, which makes it seem as if we’re continually drowning in information that principally seems to be irrelevant or false positives.

What do G2 customers dislike about CloudSEK:

“If CloudSEK may streamline its setup course of and supply extra aggressive pricing, I’d be far more inclined to advocate it.”

– CloudSEK Evaluate, Rajendra D.

In 2025, focus your information safety workflow hub in a single place with the perfect SIEM software program and select a extra centralized method of monitoring your information remotely.