Return to Silent Hill, a live-action movie adaptation of Konami’s beloved Silent Hill 2, hits theaters later this week. Early critiques for the horror flick are as scary as any monster from the video games.
First introduced in 2022, Return to Silent Hill releases on January 23. It isn’t linked to the previous two Silent Hill films, though it was directed by the primary movie’s Christophe Gans, and is as a substitute a unfastened adaptation of the PS2-era survival horror basic Silent Hill 2. Advertising for this movie has been minimal to say the least, partially as a result of it appears the executives concerned realized it wasn’t nice again when it wrapped filming in 2023, and the film is just seeing the sunshine of day after that latest Silent Hill 2 remake did so properly. However after the delay and the dearth of promoting, maybe it is a excellent horror movie? Nope. Doesn’t seem to be it.
As of January 21, there are 15 critiques for Return to Silent Hill on critic aggregator Rotten Tomatoes. And the brand new film has an abysmal seven p.c Tomatometer rating. For these not acquainted with Rotten Tomatoes, that ain’t an incredible rating. In actual fact, if this seven p.c rating holds, Return to Silent Hill will go down as one of many worst-reviewed films ever. Yikes.
The final consensus from critics is that whereas elements of Return to Silent Hill look nice, the movie is a boring, sloppy, complicated, and (maybe worst of all for the style) not-very-scary film a few primary character that’s arduous to narrate to and who appears extra confused than terrified.
“This highly effective survival horror story has been changed into an unpleasant, laughable adaptation that proves that possibly we should always’ve by no means gone again to Silent Hill,” stated Ross Bonaime over at Collider.
“Christophe Gans’s movie does away with all of the psychosexual nuance of Silent Hill 2,” claims Justin Clark at Slant Journal.
“I discovered the expertise troublesome to sit down by means of and nonsensical from second to second, with its confounding story and shoddy CGI matched solely by its lack of leisure worth,” stated critic Brian Eggert.
For the time being, there is just one non-rotten rating, from Dominic Baez on the Seattle Instances, and it doesn’t learn like a loving endorsement of the film. As a substitute, it looks like Baez discovered many of the film dangerous, however loved the ending. The tip credit are apparently very “fashionable.” When critics are praising your credit and never a lot else, that’s a nasty signal.
