Here is What I’d Use in 2026

Zoom vs. Microsoft Groups: What’s totally different and what’s not

I switched between the 2 instruments frequently, and one factor grew to become clear quick: they deal with conferences otherwise. Zoom treats a gathering as its personal second. Groups treats it as one a part of an ongoing workspace.

Each remedy the identical drawback, however that distinction modifications how work truly flows. The situations under are the place I noticed the most important gaps, and the place you would possibly really feel essentially the most tangible distinction in your individual day-to-day life.

Zoom vs. Microsoft Groups: The variations

• Assembly format and focus: Zoom retains the assembly UI easy and centered on video, display screen share, and core controls, so the decision itself stays entrance and middle. Groups locations the assembly inside a chat or channel, with messages and information sitting alongside the decision, so it appears like one a part of an ongoing workspace.Ease of becoming a member of conferences: Zoom makes becoming a member of calls fast as a result of the assembly exists independently of any broader account setup. Visitors can enter with minimal friction. Groups work easily when everyone seems to be inside the identical Microsoft 365 group. Exterior members can be a part of, however their expertise could also be restricted based mostly on the configured visitor entry
• Browser vs. desktop app expertise: Zoom works reliably within the browser for each hosts and company, which reduces friction for exterior conferences. Groups helps browser entry, too, however the desktop app works higher for company outdoors the group. For exterior calls, Zoom’s browser-first method was extra constant.
• Collaboration round paperwork: In Zoom, collaboration is strongest through the name via display screen sharing, annotations, reactions, and whiteboards, whereas follow-up work sometimes strikes into different instruments your crew already makes use of.
  In Groups, paperwork, feedback, and follow-ups keep tied to the identical chat or channel, making it straightforward to search out shared information after the assembly ends.
• Ecosystem and integrations: Zoom matches comfortably into combined device stacks and connects with a variety of third-party apps with out assuming a particular productiveness suite. Groups is strongest when paired with Microsoft 365, the place conferences, calendars, information, duties, and notes all join throughout Outlook, OneDrive, SharePoint, Planner, and Loop.
• AI help and summaries (when enabled): Zoom’s AI options are centered primarily on the assembly itself, serving to with summaries, highlights, and motion objects from particular person calls. Groups’ AI, when obtainable via Microsoft 365 licenses, can pull context from chats, emails, paperwork, and conferences, so insights stretch past a single name into the remainder of the workspace.
• Recordings and the place they stay: Zoom shops cloud recordings and transcripts (on supported plans) in its personal recording library, which works nicely if Zoom is your major assembly device. Groups shops recordings and transcripts (when enabled) in OneDrive or SharePoint, in order that they sit alongside different venture information and might be managed with the identical entry controls.
• Giant conferences and occasions: Zoom is commonly the go-to for webinars and large-scale occasions. It is acquainted to affix, has a straightforward circulation, and provides minimal friction for attendees. Groups affords structured occasion codecs like inner city halls, with built-in registration, Q&A moderation, and attendee analytics.
• Exterior vs. inner workflows: Zoom works nicely while you’re frequently assembly with individuals outdoors your group; there is not any shared system wanted. Groups matches higher when most of your collaboration occurs internally, with conversations tied to paperwork, duties, and ongoing initiatives.
• Video reliability & high quality: Zoom maintains a status for steady audio/video efficiency, particularly in mixed-network or exterior setups. Groups performs nicely, too, however the expertise can range barely based mostly on organizational configuration and bandwidth insurance policies.
• Pricing and admin expertise: Zoom’s pricing facilities round assembly capability, recording options, and webinar choices, making it easy for groups that primarily want video calls. Groups’ pricing is dependent upon Microsoft 365 licensing, the place conferences are bundled with e mail, storage, and productiveness instruments. Admin settings, permissions, and visitor entry insurance policies additionally affect how the assembly expertise feels.

Zoom and Microsoft Groups: The similarities

As soon as the most important variations are clear, the pure query is: are there baseline gaps I want to fret about?
In common use, there weren’t. Throughout core areas, each instruments delivered the identical outcomes.

• Video calls behave the identical at a sensible degree. For traditional conferences like weekly syncs, venture opinions, and longer discussions with display screen sharing, each Zoom and Groups behaved equally. Video layouts adjusted easily, display screen sharing labored with out friction, and participant controls stayed straightforward to handle.
• Hybrid conferences observe the identical playbook. In setups with some individuals in a room and others distant, the circulation stays the identical. Muting, hand raises, breakout rooms, and managing bigger teams work predictably on each platforms.
• Reviewing previous conferences works reliably on each. As soon as recording and transcription are enabled, replaying calls, looking transcripts, and leaping to particular moments really feel comparable. The place information are saved differs, however the overview expertise does not.
• Chat and light-weight collaboration work the identical in-meeting. Throughout calls, chat, reactions, and fast file sharing behave identically. This issues most in bigger conferences, the place individuals can contribute with out interrupting.
• Cellular participation is absolutely usable, not a fallback. Becoming a member of from a telephone did not really feel like a compromise on both app. Core controls have been straightforward to achieve, audio stayed clear, and video tailored easily even when networks modified.
• Bigger conferences keep manageable. For larger periods, like coaching calls, team-wide updates, and inner displays, each instruments dealt with scale nicely. Speaker controls, muting massive teams, and holding periods orderly labored as anticipated.

Now, we all know what these chatbots say they will do, however the proof is within the pudding, which is why I examined them on 11 real-world duties. 

Disclaimer: AI responses could range based mostly on phrasing, session historical past, and system updates for a similar prompts. These outcomes replicate the fashions’ capabilities on the time of testing.

Zoom vs. Microsoft Groups: How they carried out in actual workflows

1. Exterior shopper conferences

Since a lot of the work includes exterior conversations, the comparability begins by taking a look at how each instruments deal with first-time joins.

On Zoom, these conferences normally started with out friction. I shared the hyperlink, the opposite particular person entered their title, and we have been speaking virtually instantly. There wasn’t a lot to consider past the dialog itself.

Exterior shopper becoming a member of interface for Zoom

I attempted the identical circulation with Groups. When the opposite particular person was already on Microsoft 365, the be a part of expertise was clean. Once they weren’t, becoming a member of concerned a couple of extra steps like selecting the way to be a part of, confirming identification, or ready briefly earlier than getting in.

Exterior shopper becoming a member of interface for Microsoft Groups

Each labored, however the distinction confirmed up in how rapidly the decision truly started.

Winner: Zoom