What Stood Out In My Evaluation

Some years again, I witnessed a magnanimous safety breach of a trademarked firm web site in my earlier firm, which left the IT group frozen in shock.

Had the menace been detected or analyzed earlier, a correct menace detection and mitigation framework may need prevented the mishap.

It additionally intrigued me to have some talks over tea with my firm’s community engineers and cybersecurity analysts to get intel on the options or advantages they search from a menace intelligence instrument right this moment.

With their insights, I seen the demand for multi-source knowledge aggregation to create and correlate threats, real-time menace detection and monitoring, automation, AI-driven knowledge privateness, and contextual menace intelligence, that are key options in menace intelligence instruments that may forestall disastrous outcomes.

With this define, I sought to investigate and consider 7 finest menace intelligence instruments available in the market right this moment to create and co-relate threats, analyze and mitigate safety dangers and scale back the dependency on handbook groups to extract menace histories and causes. Let’s get into it!

7 finest menace intelligence instruments: my prime picks

A menace intelligence instrument protects and safeguards a corporation towards numerous safety dangers, akin to cyber assaults, brute power assaults, zero-day assaults, and zero-day vulnerabilities. Once I began evaluating menace intelligence instruments, my main focus was on which instruments are fitted with the most recent safety protocols to take care of robust encryption requirements for a corporation’s knowledge and supply real-time menace detection.

Whereas evaluating and researching, I famous key parameters {that a} safety group searches for, akin to the necessity to acquire and correlate menace knowledge from numerous sources, together with open supply intelligence (OSINT), industrial feeds, and inner logs. Patrons additionally search instruments that provide AI-based automation for menace evaluation and contextual menace intelligence to detect ways, methods, and procedures concerning threats.

My evaluation covers the highest 7 menace intelligence instruments available in the market, which supply strong safety frameworks to fight any threat of unwarranted threats.

What makes a menace intelligence instrument value it: my opinion 

My evaluation had a singleton conclusion; a instrument that identifies clever patterns of AI-powered cyberattacks or knowledge breaches and alerts the system about potential threats or safety warnings is a perfect menace intelligence instrument.

Additional, these programs combine with SIEM instruments, antivirus instruments and endpoint detection instruments to strengthen the safety posture and determine and mitigate threats sooner.

With a powerful concentrate on safety and privateness, I recognized the next essential options that you need to look out for in a menace intelligence instrument. 

• Automated menace knowledge aggregation and normalization: Once I assess any menace intelligence instrument, the very first thing I guarantee is that it might create and correlate menace knowledge from a number of sources like OSINT, inner logs, and industrial feeds. This was a vital step in contextualizing menace and standardizing menace patterns for quicker evaluation and real-time detection. With out aggregation and normalization, menace knowledge stays chaotic and nearly unusable. An excellent instrument unifies this data and saves numerous handbook hours of labor for analysts.
• Contextualized menace enrichment: I additionally thought-about which instruments contextualized threats along with sending an alert or warning within the system. A powerful menace enrichment module is essential to forecasting and mitigating the menace. The platform should layer important metadata, akin to attacker ways (MITRE ATT&CK), industries focused, and malware households used, so that you simply aren’t simply seeing what the menace is but additionally why it issues to them particularly. Instruments that fail to do that go away customers flying blind.
• Actual-time menace detection and alerting: Clever snoopers or attackers create new infiltration patterns each second. Which is why a menace intelligence instrument ought to be powered with real-time detection and actionable alerting. Whether or not through integrations with SIEMs, SOARs, or standalone dashboards, these instruments ought to struggle AI-powered attacking mechanisms with tight protection mitigation methods. With real-time menace detection, you possibly can transfer and react at machine velocity and never with a “next-business-day” nature. 
• Tailor-made intelligence on your trade and threat profile: In my analysis, these instruments are deemed finest as a result of they permit you to customise menace feeds and intelligence based mostly in your trade, geography, digital footprint, and particular threat urge for food. Customization ensures that the group will get related, actionable insights and never a truckload of irrelevant alerts with no measurement of threat depth.
• Menace investigation and deep dive analytics module: These instruments wanted to be outfitted with a complicated analytics dashboard to show menace instances, menace sources, and menace mitigation knowledge. They even have investigation workbenches the place you possibly can pivot between menace indicators, discover assault paths, enrich IPs and domains, and join dots throughout campaigns. Investigative agility makes the distinction between reactive defence and proactive looking. 
• Collaboration, sharing and reporting capabilities: In a contemporary safety ecosystem, no group operates alone. That is why I shortlisted instruments which have built-in mechanisms for sharing intelligence with inner or exterior groups, organizations and even ISACs and nationwide cyber alliances to type a sturdy infrastructure of safety. Equally necessary is automated and customizable reporting in order that safety groups can simply talk threat and affect to management and non-technical stakeholders.

All of it boils right down to how a menace intelligence instrument creates menace knowledge, contextualizes threats with forecasting, and catches maintain of sensible AI-based breaches to set off menace alerts and protection methods to counter dangers.

Instruments that stood out when it comes to buyer satisfaction, buyer phase, and G2 sentiment scoring are the highest menace intelligence instrument contenders on this record since they’re based mostly on real-time G2 person evaluate knowledge.

Out of a number of menace intelligence instruments that I evaluated, the highest 7 have made it to this record. This record beneath comprises real evaluations from the menace intelligence class web page. To be included on this class, a software program should:

• Present data on rising threats and vulnerabilities.
• Element remediation practices for frequent and rising threats.
• Analyze world threats on various kinds of networks and gadgets 
• Cater menace data to particular IT options.

*This knowledge was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some evaluations might have been edited for readability.  

Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a cloud native endpoint detection and utility safety platform that retains your safety programs updated and defends your on-prem or cloud knowledge towards unwarranted assaults or breaches.

What instantly impressed me was how straightforward it was to combine with my present Azure setup. The preliminary deployment was largely easy; no further configuration is required until you are going deep into hybrid or multi-cloud environments.

It simply clicked with Azure providers, Microsoft 365, and even AWS and GCP, which was a pleasing shock. Additionally they have a pay-as-you-go subscription mannequin that feels versatile in case you are not prepared for a giant dedication upfront.

One of many first issues that stood out was the safety rating dashboard. It is like a real-time report card on your cloud posture that highlights vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and dangerous assets. I beloved how detailed it was, breaking down particular person assets inside every subscription and giving clear suggestions for fixing points. 

Typically, in case you are fortunate, you possibly can even simply click on “Repair” and it auto remediates. That saved me a bunch of time. Plus, the mixing with Azure Energetic Listing made identification safety tremendous easy.

The distinction between tiers in premium options was fairly noticeable. The free tier offers you fundamentals like safety assessments, suggestions, and coverage administration. Truthfully, that is sufficient to get you began.

However as soon as I upgraded to the usual plan, issues received a little bit extra highly effective. I received entry to just-in-time VM entry, adaptive utility controls, and community menace detection. The Simply in time entry function is a lifesaver in case you are working with VMs and want to cut back publicity with out manually shutting issues on and off on a regular basis.

Additionally, there’s one other function often called Defender for Servers, a premium plan that stunned me with options like file integrity monitoring (it alerts on file adjustments however typically misses the context of potential malicious exercise). It could be even higher if they may proactively flag behaviours as a substitute of simply logging adjustments.

I additionally need to point out their help for menace safety, real-time detection, AI-based menace analytics, anti-malware, and anti-phishing. It is particularly nice at monitoring e-mail threats, with whitelisting choices that allow you to shield trusted distributors.

Plus, the multi-cloud safety protection is not simply Azure-exclusive; it expands throughout AWS and GCP, providing insights and proposals tailor-made to every cloud.

There are some areas to enhance, nevertheless. Some customers actually struggled with the problem of complexity. Establishing among the extra superior options, like multi-cloud monitoring or integrations with third-party options like Mimecast, wasn’t precisely plug-and-play, particularly should you aren’t acquainted with how Microsoft buildings its insurance policies and configurations.

Some customers even discovered third-party connections clunkier. And a few had been irritated with the speed of false positives.

Defender typically flagged completely benign actions as suspicious, inflicting pointless alerts that my group needed to waste time investigating. 

Pricing was one other problem. For small companies, particularly, the transfer to extra superior plans might really feel steep, and the truth that sure anticipated options (like deeper e-mail safety or Workplace integrations) are typically locked behind greater tiers felt a bit irritating. 

So far as efficiency is anxious, it was largely stable, however in environments with unstable web connections, the dependency on cloud typically led to slight lag.  And the help expertise appeared closely tiered. Until you’ve a paid subscription with Microsoft Assist, you aren’t at all times assured top-tier assist.

Additionally, if I’m being sincere, the person interface was a bit incomprehensible. Microsoft tends to roll out new options and UI adjustments fairly quickly, so proper if you get used to a format, it is possible that they’ll throw a curveball your method. 

General, Microsoft Defender for Cloud protects your on-premises and cloud knowledge towards the danger of safety breaches and helps you monitor safety postures throughout totally different databases from a centralized platform.

What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

• Though the instrument supplies endpoint safety for all gadgets, the deployment course of could be very advanced when configuring safety for iOS gadget. 
• One other gripe I discovered was the pricing. It could shortly grow to be costly, and the overload of alerts results in false positives. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud:

“What I dislike about Microsoft Defender for Cloud is the advanced pricing, which might shortly grow to be costly, and the overload of alerts, usually resulting in false positives. Moreover, the mukti-cloud help is not as strong for non-azure platforms, the preliminary setups may be difficult for groups with out cloud safety setup expertise.”

– Microsoft Defender for Cloud Assessment, Archi P.

Recorded Future supplies a whole breakdown of real-time safety breaches or threats, initiates menace mitigation practices, and protects your safety firewall towards snoops or spies.

What actually hooked me from the start was how quick and clever it feels- like having an analyst group working 24/7, continually feeding me actionable menace insights. It isn’t simply knowledge dumped from random sources, Recorded Future curates menace intelligence from a formidable mixture of open internet, darkish internet, closed boards and technical telemetry, and someway all of it is smart.

I can belief the alerts I obtain as a result of they aren’t solely real-time but additionally prioritized based mostly on relevance and affect.

I additionally appreciated the fusion of machine velocity assortment with human-curated evaluation. It means I do not simply get the automated noise; I get contextual and enriched intelligence that I can work on.

This mixture actually helps our proactive, intelligence-driven safety operations. The integration with SIEMs and SOAR platforms makes life simpler too, as every thing plugs in seamlessly with out having to create workarounds.

I additionally recognize the myriad of options, like their super-detailed menace maps, threat scores, and entity profiles. If you’re in a giant group, the premium options in upper-tier subscriptions provide much more superior modules like assault floor monitoring, model safety, and geopolitical intelligence. 

Some plans additionally include analyst-on-demand providers, which is nice once I want skilled validation for a fast strategic seek the advice of and recommendation. 

Nevertheless, there have been a couple of areas that I struggled with, and even G2 reviewers talked about as potential areas of enchancment. The interface, whereas highly effective, felt overwhelming at first. There’s simply a lot knowledge, and until you’re taking the time to tune it and filter what’s related, you’ll drown within the sea of alerts that the system detects.

I’ve positively needed to lean on our account executives throughout onboarding to make sense of every thing. And I ought to point out,  these account executives are significantly top-notch. Their help group is tremendous responsive and proactive. It is simply that typically we depend on them a bit an excessive amount of to get the total worth of the platform.

I really feel just like the pricing may be steep and exorbitant as effectively. Recorded Future is not low-cost, and so they have moved from a unified license mannequin to a extra modular pricing construction. The pliability is good in idea, nevertheless it additionally implies that extra superior options like fraud detection, vulnerability intelligence, or nation-state actor monitoring are locked behind extra premium plans. For small safety groups or budget-conscious orgs, this could be a bit proscribing.

General, I really feel recorded future helps create and co-relate menace knowledge from inner programs, present a menace mitigation framework, and analyze real-time menace detection situations to raise your safety a notch.

What I dislike about Recorded Future:

• Whereas Recorded Future presents a whole package deal, nevertheless it comes with a value. I seen that the superior tier plans require you to pay a hefty quantity. Additionally, it’s essential to pay for every further API integration, so the licensing mannequin is dear.
• I additionally discovered that whereas the platform is highly effective, it may be difficult for brand new customers to make the most of and work with it with out intensive coaching. The educational curve is steep, notably for superior options like question builder and integrations.

What do G2 customers dislike about Recorded Future:

“The recorded future has so many various modules that it may be a bit obscure what capabilities my group does and doesn’t have entry to.”

– Recorded Future Assessment, Tyler C.

Cyberint is an end-to-end cyber intelligence platform that permits firms to detect, analyze, and examine unwarranted actions and cyber threats earlier than they adversely affect the general privateness community.

I’ve been exploring Cyberint’s Argos Menace Intelligence Platform for fairly a while, and I’ve to say that it’s a blended bag. What actually drew me in at first was how intuitive and user-friendly the interface is. It would not bombard you with jargon or overcomplicated workflows, which is precisely what’s necessary when integrating it along with your safety operations.

The instrument’s safety framework was accomplished by real-time menace detection and assault floor monitoring. Inside days, Argos helped our group determine and reply to darkish internet threats and model impersonations we did not even know existed.

I additionally appreciated their customizable alert system. Every alert comes tagged with the respective menace type- be it fishing, credential leaks, uncovered belongings, or suspicious mentions on illicit boards.

The platform would not simply throw knowledge at you; it contextualizes it. We notably benefited from their darkish internet intelligence and deep visibility into menace actors’ ways, methods, and procedures (TTPs). It felt like having a 24/7 menace hunter embedded in our group.

A function I’ve come to depend on closely is Argo’s third-party threat monitoring, which checks for vulnerabilities throughout our vendor ecosystem. This sort of foresight has saved us a number of occasions from potential publicity. The model safety module is top-notch. It actively displays social media, rogue domains, and pretend apps impersonating our enterprise. Truthfully, it’s one of the crucial full suites I’ve seen in a menace intelligence platform.

That mentioned, it’s not with out its faults. For starters, the API can really feel undercooked. I used to be anticipating much more mature and versatile catalog for integration into our broader SOAR pipeline, however I discovered it missing. Some customers, together with me, additionally struggled with the restricted customization of dashboards and experiences. 

It is like when you hit the boundaries of the UI, you are caught. There has additionally been suggestions round copying/pasting visible knowledge like menace graphs or picture proof, which is not seamless and provides friction when collaborating throughout groups.

One other subject we bumped into was round false positives. Whereas uncommon, after they do occur, the filtering and suggestions mechanism isn’t as easy as I’d like. I additionally discovered that some options appeared half-baked or unnecessarily gated, probably relying on the pricing tier, although that half isn’t at all times clearly communicated.

Talking of pricing, Cyberint presents a number of plan tiers. Whereas they don’t publish them publicly, based mostly on my analysis and others’ experiences, the core differentiators usually revolve across the depth of exterior assault floor protection, the quantity of monitored belongings, and the SLA-driven menace response timeframes.

Their premium plans embody devoted analysts, superior API entry, and customized model monitoring rulesets. In case your org is mid-to-large scale and actively focused, I’d positively advocate going for the upper tier.

General, Cyberint presents end-to-end menace safety, deep monitoring, and safety towards exterior vulnerabilities inside its software program stack to safeguard your belongings towards threats.

What I dislike about Cyberint:

• Whereas Cyberint supplies end-to-end alerts about energetic assaults, it’s essential to manually replace the standing of alerts, even when you’ve got performed so through a SIEM system.
• I additionally seen some minor UI bugs, like alerts not opening in a brand new web page when urgent Ctrl+click on. 

What do G2 customers dislike about Cyberint:

There are options within the resolution that appear to have redundant performance, however nonetheless, such performance remains to be useful to a corporation.

One other factor is that the extra options could be a bit regarding when it comes to the group’s funds. However, if such a burden may be dealt with, I totally help having this resolution in case you are searching for a cyber menace intelligence resolution

– Cyberint Assessment, Gen Hart B.

Crowdstrike Endpoint Safety Platform supplies anti-ransomware options to take care of safety benchmark throughout all of your community gadgets and tech stack. It covers incidents, vulnerabilities, assaults, and malware detection below its belt.

What instantly stood out to me was how light-weight it’s. It doesn’t lavatory down system efficiency like some older-gen antivirus instruments do. The setup was refreshingly straightforward, too. I used to be in a position to deploy it throughout endpoints with minimal friction, and the unified agent structure meant I didn’t must juggle a number of installs for various modules.

Considered one of its superpowers is real-time menace detection. CrowdStrike’s cloud-native structure leverages behavioral analytics and AI-based menace intelligence to proactively detect anomalies like ransomware, fileless malware, zero-day assaults, and extra.

I used to be additionally impressed with how briskly it reacts. The Falcon Stop module (included even within the base plan) already outperforms many conventional AVs, however as quickly as I added Falcon Perception for EDR, I actually noticed the ability of real-time telemetry and investigation. The extent of element it supplies is like having a magnifying glass into your community exercise.

What I additionally recognize is the single-agent method. I didn’t must overload machines with totally different endpoint instruments. Whether or not it was vulnerability administration by way of Falcon Highlight, menace looking through Falcon OverWatch, or gadget management, every thing built-in seamlessly.

Should you go for higher-tier plans like Falcon Enterprise or Falcon Full, you additionally get 24/7 managed menace looking, which, let’s be sincere, is a recreation changer when your group is small or overworked. These guys virtually grow to be your SOC extension.

However there are some drawbacks to the instrument. One factor that I need to level out is the price, as a result of it isn’t essentially the most inexpensive platform on the market. If you’re in a small enterprise or simply beginning out, the module pricing would possibly really feel a bit an excessive amount of.

One other space the place it lacked a bit was buyer help. Whereas I had stable interactions with help group, however there have been occasions that ticket resolutions received a bit extra dragged.

I additionally need to point out the incidence of “false positives.” They’re uncommon, however after they do pop up, it may be a bit tough to analyze and suppress until you might be tremendous acquainted with the console.

Talking of it, the Falcon Console is highly effective, however not precisely intuitive for first-timers. It took me a little bit of poking round to know all dashboards and settings.
And whereas the platform excels in detection, I really feel the remediation capabilities can enhance.

General, Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Detection supplies full protection towards unwarranted threats or assaults and helps you mitigate deadly threats or breakouts.

What I dislike about Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Safety Platform:

• Though it does an amazing job of offering alerts and updates, we can not go into a lot element once we choose the sensor from the system tray.
• I additionally seen that there are various screens to handle, it’s exhausting to succeed in each function, and there’s a want to know computer systems at a excessive degree.

What do G2 customers dislike about Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform:

“For some newer apps, the extent of integration is not as pleasant and easy appropriately. Additionally, Linux help may be improved.”

– Crowdstrike Falcon Endpoint Detection Platform Assessment, Atanu M.

Mimecast Superior Electronic mail Safety supplies AI-powered knowledge safety towards email-borne and harmful assaults. It leverages machine studying and social graphing to detect threats in real-time.

Mimecast is likely one of the instruments that runs quietly within the background, shielding our group from phishing, malware, spoofing, and impersonation makes an attempt. It hardly ever lets something malicious slip by way of.

The AI-driven safety is legit, I’ve seen it catch some extremely subtle impersonation makes an attempt, particularly these tough CEO fraud-style emails that used to fly below the radar.

Considered one of my favourite options is its real-time hyperlink and attachment scanning. When an e-mail hits your inbox, Mimecast doesn’t simply let it go by way of. It actively scans every thing embedded within the message. Plus, the e-mail continuity function additionally proves useful. Throughout service outages, Mimecast retains our e-mail site visitors flowing in order that communication would not cease.

I additionally appreciated the admin dashboard, which is stacked with capabilities. Initially, it felt a bit overwhelming, however type of thrilling. When you get previous the preliminary curve, although, it turns into a robust management heart.

You may configure insurance policies right down to the smallest element, set granular filtering guidelines, and simply entry logs and menace experiences. I particularly recognize the e-mail archiving and e-discovery instruments. They’re clear, searchable, and make regulatory compliance easy.

However the platform does have its share of limitations. False positives could be a little bit of ache. Mimecast is typically too aggressive, flagging professional messages as suspicious.

The false positives could be a little bit of a ache. Mimecast is typically too aggressive, flagging professional messages as suspicious, which implies I’ve to step in and manually launch or whitelist sure emails. That would not be such a trouble if the interface for whitelisting weren’t a bit clunky.

Additionally, configuring superior insurance policies can typically require a great deal of trial and error, and some of my colleagues have grumbled about SAML login errors that have an effect on admin entry intermittently.

So far as pricing is anxious, Mimecast is not low-cost. It positively contains extra premium plans. Relying in your subscription tier, you get various ranges of help and have depth. I explored a lower-tier help plan, however even then, the response occasions have been stable. That mentioned, some customers talked about that they’d like quicker decision, particularly for pressing safety occasions.

What I discover notably useful is how scalable Mimecast is. Its cloud-based deployment makes it tremendous straightforward to develop along with your group, whether or not you might be including customers or extending insurance policies to new areas.

For bigger organizations, coping with heavy e-mail volumes and complicated menace vectors, it’s essential that the instrument presents flexibility because the enterprise scales and grows its infrastructure.

General, Mimecast presents tight-knit e-mail safety protection and encryption to safe important knowledge exchanges and alerts the system on the incidence of any infiltration.

What I dislike about Mimecast Superior Electronic mail Safety

• Though Mimecast detects any presence of phishing makes an attempt or malware in emails, it may be a bit aggressive with filtering, resulting in false positives that require handbook evaluate.
• One other factor I seen is that Mimecast flags professional emails as suspicious at occasions, resulting in delays in communication.

What do G2 customers dislike about Mimecast Superior Electronic mail Safety:

The draw back is that the help is a little bit off-putting in case you are previous your implementation part. A few of the guidelines and insurance policies are exhausting to configure by way of implementation.

– Mimecast Superior Electronic mail Safety Assessment, Jessica C.

Threatlocker is a good instrument for detecting and capturing undesirable exercise throughout your safety community. It supplies a suite of cybersecurity instruments to scale your knowledge and content material safety workflows and scale back the danger of information breaches or vulnerabilities.

I’ve explored a number of safety instruments earlier than, however Threatlocker stands out, largely as a result of it does what it guarantees. From the start, it was clear that this wasn’t a primary antivirus or general-purpose instrument. It is constructed particularly to implement zero belief on the utility degree.

The core function, utility whitelisting, implies that solely software program we’ve explicitly authorised can run. It offers us speedy visibility into unauthorized applications and, in lots of instances, stops potential threats earlier than they even begin.

One other function I take advantage of closely is Ringfencing. It’s not nearly what apps can run but additionally about what they’re allowed to work together with. For instance, I can cease a trusted utility like Microsoft Phrase from launching PowerShell or accessing delicate knowledge directories. This degree of segmentation has helped us forestall lateral motion and prohibit how even authorised instruments can behave.

ThreatLocker’s help group has been one of the crucial dependable elements of the expertise. Any time we hit a configuration subject or wanted steering, they had been fast to reply and useful all through. That degree of help made an actual distinction, particularly within the early days once we had been nonetheless determining find out how to construction insurance policies successfully.

That mentioned, the training curve was important. It took time to know how totally different insurance policies work together and find out how to construction guidelines with out over-blocking or permitting an excessive amount of. It’s not one thing you arrange in an hour and neglect about—it requires an actual dedication to managing insurance policies and staying on prime of latest alerts.

There have been additionally moments the place the platform’s quick tempo of improvement made issues difficult. Options had been up to date or added ceaselessly, and whereas that exhibits the product is actively bettering, it additionally implies that documentation typically lagged behind. At occasions, it felt like we needed to relearn components of the platform extra usually than we’d like.

Other than this, the instrument additionally contains different helpful options like storage management to dam unauthorized USB entry, which has prevented the danger of information leaks. The elevation management module permits us to tightly handle which customers can run software program with elevated privileges, thereby making privilege escalation extra auditable.

We additionally depend on centralized logging and audit trails to evaluate any violations or exceptions, which is essential for compliance and inner evaluations.

General, Threatlocker lets you rigorously monitor your safety workflows and be certain that your knowledge is dealt with accurately by approved customers throughout the group to get rid of any sudden menace likelihood.

What I dislike about Threatlocker:

• Whereas Threatlocker empowers you to enhance your zero belief method and privileges, it takes a while to fine-tune insurance policies, particularly to start with, and managing approvals could be a little bit of a studying curve.
• Whereas Threatlocker is a sturdy safety instrument, the general studying curve might be steep for customers who will not be acquainted with its interface and complicated configurations.

What do G2 customers dislike about Threatlocker:

“It isn’t a draw back, however ThreatLocker requires time & assets to completely perceive the product and supply wonderful help to your prospects. It isn’t a click on and deploy and by no means take a look at it once more product. That mentioned, we spend possibly 1-2 hours every week reviewing approval requests after the preliminary rollout.”

– Threatlocker Assessment, Jonathan G. 

CloudSEK is an AI-powered menace intelligence instrument that detects cyber-threats, extends safety protection to cloud databases, and displays any suspicious exercise from a centralized platform to enhance knowledge protection mechanisms.

The very first thing that caught my eye was the dashboard. It’s extremely intuitive and neatly laid out, making it straightforward to get a complete snapshot of your menace panorama with out drowning in noise.

Every little thing from model monitoring to VIP safety and digital threat monitoring is offered in a method that simply is smart. I discovered it tremendous helpful to have all these modules tightly built-in; it gave me a whole image of our digital publicity with minimal effort.

What I like most about CloudSEK is its proactive method. The platform would not simply provide you with a warning about present threats, it additionally surfaces rising dangers earlier than they escalate. That is an enormous step if you find yourself making an attempt to stay one step forward of adversaries.

As an example, their menace actor profiling and context-rich incident summaries actually helped me perceive not simply the “what”, but additionally the “who” and “why” behind every alert. Plus, their bulk closure function for incidents is an absolute time saver, particularly if you find yourself coping with recurring or false-positive susceptible alerts. 

Nevertheless, talking of false positives, there are a couple of areas the place the instrument would not fairly dwell up. Whereas the detection engine is highly effective, it might typically be a little bit too enthusiastic, flagging incidents that didn’t require escalation. It isn’t a call driver, nevertheless it does imply it’s essential to make investments a while upfront in fine-tuning your alert guidelines.

Additionally, creating new guidelines or use-cases isn’t as easy as I’d like. It could really feel a bit inflexible in comparison with different platforms that provide extra customization choices out of the field.

Digging into the premium options, CloudSEK presents tiered subscription plans that scale effectively relying on the maturity of your safety program. On the core, you get digital threat monitoring, floor internet and deep/darkish internet surveillance, and built-in model and area safety.

What stood out to me was the simplicity of deploying the platform. Not like some bloated safety instruments that require weeks {of professional} providers to rise up and working, CloudSEK was comparatively plug-and-play. That mentioned, I did hit a couple of bumps when making an attempt to automate sure workflows. 

It does provide API integration, however the documentation is not strong for extra customary processes. 

General,  CloudSEK supplies safe authentication frameworks to guard your digital privateness and set safety benchmarks to investigate, mitigate, and overcome real-time alerts and dangers.

What I dislike about CloudSEK:

• Though CloudSEK presents real-time menace alerts, the variety of false positives is alarming when the alert rule shouldn’t be tuned correctly.
• I additionally seen the sheer quantity of alerts, which makes it seem as if we’re continually drowning in knowledge that largely seems to be irrelevant or false positives.

What do G2 customers dislike about CloudSEK:

“If CloudSEK might streamline its setup course of and provide extra aggressive pricing, I’d be rather more inclined to advocate it.”

– CloudSEK Assessment, Rajendra D.

In 2025, focus your knowledge safety workflow hub in a single place with one of the best SIEM software program and select a extra centralized method of monitoring your knowledge remotely.