A couple of years again, the thought of a software program catching my spelling errors, and structural points sounded ridiculous. So when Grammarly began main the AI writing assistant wave, and promised to chop down limitless modifying cycles, I began utilizing it straightaway.
Little doubt, Grammarly made my life as a content material marketer simpler. It was like having a tireless pair of eyes at all times by my facet. But, I used to be looking for Grammarly options, pondering if it was actually the most effective match for all my wants.
The query grew to become much more urgent after I learn “The 22 Immutable Legal guidelines of Advertising and marketing” by Al Ries and Jack Trout. The thought of being first quite than being higher actually struck me. That’s precisely what Grammarly did. It merely conquered the thoughts first, regardless of not being the primary AI writing assistant.
I requested myself: Are there different instruments on the market that outshine Grammarly?
Being a medical graduate, I couldn’t accept a easy Google search. As a substitute, I took the lab-coat strategy and launched my very own mini trial of eight Grammarly options. I’ve compiled my trustworthy opinions on this article, saving you time on the hunt for options.
The 8 greatest Grammarly options for 2025
- Semrush is greatest for Search engine optimisation-integrated writing ($25 per 30 days).
- ProWritingAid is greatest for in-depth model evaluation and complete modifying ($30 per 30 days).
- Writesonic is greatest for versatile content material era utilizing varied AI instruments ($39 per 30 days).
- Jasper is greatest for artistic storytelling and long-form content material ($49 per 30 days).
- Rytr is greatest as a easy and budget-friendly AI instrument ($9 per 30 days).
- Pepper Content material is greatest for model and marketing-focused content material ($99 per 30 days).
- Copy.ai is greatest for advertising and marketing and workspace-based AI ($49 per 30 days).
- Anyword is greatest for data-led copywriting ($49 per 30 days).
*A few of these merchandise provide a free trial. I’ve included their beginning costs for a straightforward comparability.
What to search for in a Grammarly different?
Grammarly is well-integrated into my writing workflows because of its ease of use and the newfound freemium options. I can entry it throughout a number of platforms as a browser extension, desktop app, and cell app.
Nonetheless, I didn’t really feel glad with it. It usually missed the mark on the tone I aimed for. Typically, it sounded too generic, stiff, and robotic. Seems, I wasn’t alone with these frustrations; G2 opinions echo my woes.
Listed here are the important thing elements an efficient AI writing assistant ought to embrace:
- Correct and contextually conscious options to keep away from pointless flags.
- Offline performance, particularly for paid plan customers. I’d wish to entry the software program anytime, anyplace, no matter my web connection.
- Superior options like paraphrasing, summarization, content material era, and translation.
- Higher efficiency that doesn’t decelerate different apps and working programs.
- Integrations with different internet functions equivalent to e-mail, Docs, or Notion.
- Supply to enhance the tone of writing by offering clever phrase options or vocabulary enhancements.
- Capabilities to allow workforce collaborations, together with in-app chat choices and approval chains.
- Plagiarism checkers or quotation turbines.
- Affordability for particular person creators and small companies.
- A transparent assertion on how software program processes and protects consumer information.
My strategy to evaluating Grammarly options:
To forestall bias created by paid commercials and faux opinions, I didn’t wish to belief the whole lot on the web. So, I received hands-on with every instrument for a full week, utilizing them to write down blogs, draft emails, and write analysis papers.
To steadiness my very own testing, I used verified G2 opinions to uncover the professionals and cons of every instrument.
Some software program had restricted entry and I couldn’t discover all its options in depth. That’s once I reached out to some writers on LinkedIn to study their expertise of various instruments. Brewing my expertise and that of others, and G2 opinions, I may create this information for you.
Disclaimer: I’ve used G2’s evaluation information, photographs, and scores from 2025 for my analysis. I am going to hold updating it to replicate the newest and greatest options. Some opinions have been edited for higher readability.
The 8 greatest Grammarly options it’s good to strive now
After deciding on the options based mostly on consumer opinions on G2, I examined them to be used instances, options, pricing, and distilled their professionals and cons. Hold studying to search out the most effective instrument to your wants.
1. Semrush: Greatest for Search engine optimisation-integrated writing
I attempted Semrush’s prompts on the whole lot, starting from drafting chilly emails and newsletters to Amazon product descriptions.
If you happen to’re somebody like me who values a easy but helpful consumer interface, then Semrush doesn’t disappoint. For each characteristic, it particulars its capabilities and meant outcomes so that you’re not clueless whereas utilizing it. Being a web-based platform, it additionally integrates with Google Docs, Microsoft Phrase, and WordPress.
The AI writing assistant instrument comes with a seven-day free trial (bank card required), after which it’s $25/month. Nonetheless, to make use of Semrush’s Search engine optimisation capabilities, you should additionally individually purchase the ContentShake AI instrument, priced at $60/month.
I attempted the Search engine optimisation writing assistant instrument to boost the discoverability of one in all G2’s weblog on digital adoption platforms. After analysing the weblog, it created a chart alongside the parameters of readability, Search engine optimisation, originality, and tone of voice, displaying the place the strongest pull was.
Whereas the instrument supplied a dependable measure of how search-optimized your weblog is, it didn’t clarify what the rating means or the way it was calculated.
Even when the instrument flagged sentences suggesting enhancements, it solely made the options referring to Search engine optimisation and readability, ignoring different elements. It might take trials and errors to assist enhance the rating.
The readability and Search engine optimisation suggestions had been particular and actionable. For example, Semrush mentioned it was greatest to shorten the article because it was longer than most greatest performing opponents. Subsequent, it beneficial key phrases I may goal, together with “buyer journey”, “buyer retention”, and “consumer base” to enhance visibility.
What I like about Semrush:
- The writing assistant helps create outlines and supply aggressive key phrases. You’ll see beneficial key phrases appropriate to your content material piece, together with search quantity and key phrase issue.
- The AI rephraser characteristic produces a number of variations of the identical textual content to enhance reliability and assist convey the meant which means.
What G2 customers like about Semrush:
“What I like greatest about Semrush is its all-in-one strategy to digital advertising and marketing. I can analysis key phrases, analyze opponents, audit my web site, observe backlinks, and monitor model visibility — multi functional place. The interface is intuitive, and the instruments are highly effective but simple to make use of.”
– Semrush Evaluation, Sergei S, Chief Expertise Officer at an actual property agency.
What I dislike about Semrush:
- Not having offline entry to the writing assistant could be a hurdle should you’re travelling in areas of patchy connectivity.
- The instrument doesn’t at all times counsel how you might enhance originality and tone of voice, regardless of pointing to common scores for them.
What G2 customers dislike about Semrush:
“A number of the extra superior options can really feel overwhelming at first, particularly for inexperienced persons. It additionally will get a bit dear as you scale up or want further customers. A extra versatile pricing mannequin would make it even higher.”
– Semrush Evaluation, Hemant A., Search engine optimisation head at a small enterprise.
2. ProWritingAid: Greatest for complete modifying
The interface of ProWritingAid feels intuitive, making it simple to work with a number of options. I like how reviews can be found in a single place. Few options, like real-time construction evaluation and the model of doing grammar checks, had been just like Grammarly’s.
I liked how I may simply combine the instrument with many different functions like Docs or Phrase, together with browser extensions (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari).
One other factor that impressed me was ProWritingAid’s offline performance. For somebody like me who likes to journey, usually to distant places, this gives what most different AI writing assistants lack.
Now for the check! I started with a easy paragraph in regards to the “significance of sleep for well being” for a analysis paper, and it did a good job of setting the fitting tone by rephrasing and analysing my targets. Nonetheless, to my disappointment, I seen it lagged in producing informational content material.
From a analysis viewpoint, the instrument doesn’t have a quotation instrument. But its plagiarism checker flags weaker areas that want citations. You’ll should browse for credible sources, which could be time-taking.
After utilizing this software program extensively, I skilled a slowdown of the appliance I used to be engaged on. Many different G2 reviewers reported the identical points.
Whereas their free plan gives quite a lot of options, the 500-word rely restrict makes it much less helpful. To jot down an extended piece, I’ll should shell out $30/month for a plan.
What I like about ProWritingAid:
- It doesn’t dictate different options. As a substitute, ProWritingAid reveals me how the sentence construction could possibly be improved, serving to retain the writer’s voice
- It permits you to evaluate your writing to a best-selling writer in that style. This lends some confidence to the consumer and helps them discover their voice.
What G2 customers like about ProWritingAid:
“Of the various modifying packages I’ve tried, I discovered Professional Writing Help the simplest and most thorough. I ship all my manuscripts by it and rely upon it to catch my errors and omissions. It really works quick, is reliable, and never solely fixes my writing, however I additionally study from its hints. I am unable to consider one other modifying support as environment friendly and straightforward to make use of.”
– ProWritingAid Evaluation, David S, Author and Illustrator.
What I dislike about ProWritingAid:
- The fixed popping of options whereas utilizing the appliance could be distracting. It might be higher if options confirmed solely after I hovered over marked sections.
- The instrument is just an support. It doesn’t help generative capabilities to provide content material based mostly on particular prompts.
What G2 customers dislike about ProWritingAid:
“Being a synthetic intelligence, it could possibly’t substitute the human eye solely. A number of the options or corrections are merely mistaken, and this system will not at all times get the small nuances of what you’ve got written. You continue to want your individual judgment and information for a very good variety of options.”
– Professional Writing Help Evaluation, Elli C, Guide Coach.
3. Writesonic: Greatest for versatile content material era
Writesonic caters to each inexperienced persons and skilled writers. The dashboard provides a wide range of templates and instruments.
The instrument helps the usage of a constant model voice throughout content material varieties. Its potential to counsel different phrase selections that higher match the context actually stood out to me.
What’s extra, the summarization characteristic permits you to glean data from a prolonged content material piece rapidly.
That mentioned, once I tried the punctuation instrument for a weblog on well being tech, it supplied fundamental corrections, however they weren’t as complete as a devoted grammar test instrument.
What I like about Writesonic:
- The instrument performs nicely for concept era, particularly for divergent pondering. I prompted the platform to generate matter concepts round AI functions in preventive drugs, and it listed subjects alongside a number of dimensions.
- What stood out was Writesonic’s provide of a number of textual content and picture generative AI fashions.
What G2 customers like about Writesonic:
“Highly effective writing instrument, you solely should reply 1 to 4 questions, and Writesonic generates full articles, blogs, scripts, and model kits rapidly. You do not have to fret about copyright infringements since they’re unique and human-like.”
– Writesonic Evaluation, Krissy M., Influencer Advertising and marketing Specialist.
What I dislike about Writesonic:
- Lack of easy transitions and movement whereas creating long-form content material. This may create a jerky studying expertise and make the content material sound extra robotic.
- The punctuation instrument supplied fundamental grammatical corrections however was not as complete as a devoted instrument like Grammarly.
What G2 customers dislike about Writesonic:
“I’m not a fan of their level system. Granted, you get it free of charge within the first month, however you’ll be able to solely create one article free of charge, then should pay. I additionally suppose that they need to reload their factors each month like Leonardo does for the free plan. Most of those Search engine optimisation writers do not do this.”
– Writesonic Evaluation, Ruve A., CEO of a small enterprise.
4. Jasper: Greatest for artistic storytelling and long-form content material
Jasper boasts a pleasant tone, like a companion for brainstorming concepts.
Getting began didn’t really feel like interacting with a machine in any respect. The bot is cordial — it requested my title, the sector I labored in, the scale of my firm, and a hyperlink to my top-performing web page to personalize the tone.
I attempted the seven-day free trial of their creator plan, which promised a model voice, entry to Jasper Chat and Search engine optimisation mode, all priced at $39/month in any other case. Jasper additionally has a Professional choice ($59/seat/month) and a Marketing strategy (customized pricing), which gives workforce administration, enhanced safety controls, and limitless AI-generated content material.
I used Jasper to brainstorm weblog publish concepts. It felt like ChatGPT, however with a friendlier tone.
I additionally examined it on making a weblog define, drafting an introduction, and writing a conclusion, and it carried out nicely on all fronts. Exploring its accuracy for different languages other than English revealed grammatical errors throughout translation.
I’ll admit, Jasper’s pleasant contact makes it helpful to create customized emails in a extra artistic manner than different AI instruments.
Nonetheless, lots of Jasper’s options are free elsewhere, making me query the price of its premium model. The unsubscription expertise was not easy because it hinted at suspending my account, swiping clear chats and information therein.
What I like about Jasper:
- No mechanical blabber, it appears like speaking to a good friend over a cup of espresso. I like how the intuitive expertise makes Jasper simple to work with and generate human-sounding content material.
- A variety of templates offers you path and goal with utilizing the instrument.
What G2 customers like about Jasper:
“Jasper’s better part is the massive variety of templates that make content material creation very simple. You’ll be able to select a template, i.e., a weblog or LinkedIn Submit, and Japer comes with preconfigured settings for the precise wants. This makes Jasper simpler than the standard Massive Language fashions like Chat GPT.”
– Jasper Evaluation, Nadja H., Utility Specialist at a biotechnology agency.
What I dislike about Jasper:
- There’s no quotation or fact-checking help, which makes it dangerous for analysis writing.
- Primary grammar and spell checks go away you with numerous room for heavy modifying. This instrument is good for producing a primary draft, however not for churning out a elegant finish product.
What G2 customers dislike about Jasper:
“There’s a fairly steep studying curve in terms of getting essentially the most out of AI. Studying find out how to arrange the most effective prompts will generate the most effective outcomes.”
– Jasper Evaluation, Jawad E., Head of Advertising and marketing at a small enterprise.
5. Rytr: Greatest as a easy and budget-friendly AI instrument
Reviewers of Rytr rave about its content-creation options for writing emails, messages, and blogs. So I gave it a shot. The interface is clear, minimalistic, and easy.
It has two components, one for writing help and the opposite for generative AI functions. The weblog writing expertise was simple as I may customise responses by the number of language, tone, use case, matter, key phrases, and the extent of creativity.
On selecting between tone choices like assertive, informal, or inspirational, I may sense a marked distinction within the outputs. One easy but efficient characteristic is that you simply get to decide on the variety of output variants.
You can too choose use instances starting from LinkedIn posts to YouTube video descriptions. What’s extra, its potential to generate and save content material in the identical doc helped me unify content material creation.
To get began, I examined the use case for writing a LinkedIn publish about essential dental well being ideas. In distinction to different writing assistants, Rytr began by asking my goal, key message, and target market earlier than producing a response. This helped me generate extra exact responses.
Subsequent, I performed between “informative” and “inspirational” tones, and the outcomes had been passable. The characteristic that generates meta titles and descriptions additionally did a good job.
As for the credit score restrict, the ten,000 characters/month restrict is just not preferrred for an everyday author like me. To confess, I exhausted them inside 20 minutes of my trial. Many G2 customers additionally complained in regards to the inaccurate monitoring of credit, a declare I couldn’t corroborate, owing to correct monitoring in my case.
As well as, though the instrument shifts the tone of the content material when prompted, most variations nonetheless sound robotic and unapproachable. The assertive model of the textual content I created began with “In as we speak’s digital panorama…”, suggesting the trite generative AI tone that robotically diminishes its credibility.
What I like about Rytr:
- It permits you to create content material for various media, provides loads of free options, and has workforce collaboration choices. These make it match for smaller companies or particular person creators. However the output might not be as polished as you anticipate.
- Rytr responded to my prompts in two to 3 seconds, sooner than many different writing assistants. This enhances its easy consumer interface with minimal touchpoints.
What G2 customers like about Rytr:
“I’ve been utilizing Rytr for 4 months now and completely adore it. I’m an educator and author. I like the quite a few types and the power to create one’s personal voice to help private writing initiatives. I’ve used it for YouTube channels and so many different avenues. I extremely advocate this instrument. Writers’ block is a factor of the previous.”
– Rytr Evaluation, Dr. Dan M, Training Specialist.
What I dislike about Rytr:
- Shorter-than-expected size of responses means it’s not that nice for long-form content material. Once I requested it to develop on sure sections of my LinkedIn publish, it took a number of prompts to generate one thing significant.
- It has restricted SERP evaluation options in comparison with opponents like Semrush. The evaluation and key phrase analysis lack depth and don’t match nicely with the content material creation processes.
What G2 customers dislike about Rytr:
“One notable side which may be missing is the absence of a presentation era characteristic. Implementing this performance may considerably improve the consumer expertise, significantly for professionals who require seamless integration of written content material into presentation codecs. ”
– Rytr Evaluation, Prasanna V., Deputy Supervisor, Taxation and Inside Management.
6. Pepper Content material: Greatest for model and marketing-focused content material
Proper off the bat, the annoying half about Pepper Content material is that you may register solely utilizing your organization e-mail ID, even for a trial. It doesn’t cease there. The following window asks for firm and function particulars, and call quantity. It’s a transparent signal that the platform is just not primed for particular person customers.
I used its AI content material studio to create a LinkedIn publish on the significance of dental hygiene. The preliminary end result, although stacked with data, was not structured like a LinkedIn publish. Subsequent prompts yielded repetitive data.
The AI Content material Studio characteristic I used is known as “Brainstorming with Pepper AI”. Maybe that’s why the preliminary outcomes are rudimentary and unfinished in nature.
That mentioned, Pepper Content material provides a wide range of options starting from Search engine optimisation, weblog writing and advertising and marketing companies. Its AI author assistant, referred to as Peppertype.ai is suited extra for companies and groups, quite than particular person creators. The quotation generator and plagiarism checker options may help refine research-based articles.
The consumer interface, although easy, seems somewhat bland and outdated. But that doesn’t restrict its capabilities as an built-in instrument empowering you to generate concepts, conduct an internet site audit, and run analytics.
The platform carried out satisfactorily when requested to edit a weblog. With long-form content material, the platform is dependable with its structured Search engine optimisation formatting.
Some G2 customers felt that it had restricted Search engine optimisation capabilities, a declare I examined. True to the opinions, it prompt key phrases I already ranked nicely for quite than pointing to alternatives.
What I like about Pepper Content material:
- The instrument embraces data-driven content material advertising and marketing. You’ll be able to hyperlink your Google Analytics and Google Search Console accounts to research content material advertising and marketing ROI.
- The quotation generator and plagiarism checker are beneficial instruments for enhancing research-based writing.
What G2 customers like about Pepper Content material:
“Pepper Content material curates AI-driven, significant content material for social media posts and web sites. It has helped me in my freelancing initiatives, The perfect half is that it does the work rapidly in seconds. It is appropriate for content material writers and helps them ease their work. The content material created is Search engine optimisation pleasant and helps your website or publish with good rankings.”
– Pepper Content material Evaluation, Ok M, Enterprise Guide.
What I dislike about Pepper Content material:
- The pricing hurts for particular person creators or small companies with restricted budgets. Its content material concept labs is pegged at as a lot as $398.98 for 5 customers a month.
- It has restricted artistic capabilities with a larger emphasis on informational content material. Once I requested Pepper Content material to make a LinkedIn publish extra approachable but authoritative, it leaned an excessive amount of towards an institutional tone.
What G2 customers dislike about Pepper Content material:
“I believe I dislike pepper since their inner communication is just not that good.
There’s numerous forwards and backwards occurring in between the challenge, which could be improved simply.”
– Pepper Content material Evaluation, Vedant D., Intern in analytics and advertising and marketing.
7. copy.ai: Greatest for workspace-based AI use
What stands out is copy.ai’s provide to construct your individual workflow earlier than producing content material, which lends a private contact. I additionally preferred the choice to browse immediate examples — it made it simpler to make use of the instrument for the fitting sorts of content material.
I may entry and choose between inbuilt ChatGPT 3.5 and Claude 3 Haiku to generate content material. Builders can even admire the API entry for app integration.
Within the free model, I may get simply 2,000 phrases in chat, which felt a decrease allowance than different related instruments. But the trial model didn’t ask for my bank card particulars, obviating the necessity for dedication.
The value could also be a sticking level. The starter plan comes with no phrase limits and personal group entry, which is likely to be dear in comparison with different instruments that supply extra options at a less expensive worth.
The superior plan, at $249/month, provides extra choices for custom-made workflows, though G2 opinions counsel that the workflow builder characteristic may need a studying curve.
What I like about copy.ai:
- The product description generator instrument helps create easy but persuasive copies.
- The instrument means that you can retailer details about your organization for simple reuse to generate content material.
What G2 customers like about copy.ai:
“Copy.ai creates variants of promoting texts for particular targets and goal demographics. The app can be helpful for rapidly cranking out numerous content material. Copy.ai has an intuitive consumer interface and might generate different content material for a variety of promoting initiatives and audiences.”
– Copy,ai Evaluation, Shahbaz Hassan S., Heart Supervisor at a small enterprise.
What I dislike about copy.ai:
- Whereas attempting the advertising and marketing e-mail instrument, I seen that a number of prompts generated impersonal e-mail copies. Aside from asking for demographic particulars, copy.ai should think about asking customers’ ache factors for extra focused messaging.
- The free options on the web site aren’t built-in on a single platform, precluding a unified consumer expertise. They’re talked about as “free instruments” on the web site. Every of those instruments, like define or paragraph turbines, launches in a separate window, which creates a disjointed expertise.
What G2 customers dislike about copy.ai:
“Buyer Help is nonexistent. There’s a chat, however nobody replies to that – I’ve messages which can be marked “learn” and unanswered. I’ve despatched additionally few e-mails that went with out a solution too. I’ve tried becoming a member of their official group on fb, but it surely appears nobody manages that both and my invite remains to be pending.”
– Copy.ai Evaluation, Mateusz L., E-commerce Specialist.
8. Anyword: Greatest for data-driven copywriting
Anyword’s consumer interface resembles Pepper Content material’s. In different phrases, it’s easy but outdated. I examined its distinctive content material improver characteristic to boost the introduction of a G2 article.
The development directions had completely different choices, together with “make longer,” “make shorter,” and “change tone of voice”. You can even add your individual directions. Utilizing the “improve-more partaking” choices, I received a number of variations of the introduction, which had been solely barely completely different from the unique model — one thing even ChatGPT may handle.
What stood out was how Anyword handles model consistency. Clients and prospects at all times wish to speak to firms and never particular person personalities. Anyword will get that. You’ll be able to apply the “model vocabulary” and even choose a target market to your content material.
I educated it to make use of the model tone of a particular firm by feeding best-performing articles, and it roughly creates equally sounding content material. The instrument’s modifying characteristic is correct and helped me generate a number of options based mostly on my tone desire.
That mentioned, once I tried the weblog creation characteristic to generate a bit on the function of AI in cybersecurity, it fell flat. The end result started with an overused phrase, “The digital panorama is evolving at an unprecedented tempo…” making it appear generic and robotic.
Anyword merely introduced paragraphs with out structuring the content material alongside bullet factors, headers, transition sentences — mainly, not one of the parts that assist with readability or Search engine optimisation.
What I like about Anyword:
- Anyword has completely different options mirroring completely different roles on a content material advertising and marketing workforce. You’ll be able to create content material for social media, adverts, and emails. The prompting and modifying instruments are separate, too. It’s like having your individual advertising and marketing workforce in a single place.
- The copywriting instrument is wise to combine your model voice and generate a number of spectacular outcomes. Utilizing the LinkedIn Advert copywriting characteristic, I generated a usable copy. Anyword additionally gave me the choice to peg it in opposition to different textual content I had revealed on LinkedIn beforehand by integration.
What G2 customers like about Anyword:
“I work at an promoting company the place deadlines are tight, and consumer work is at all times coming. Anyword helps my workforce and me transfer previous the brainstorming part and generate compelling copy in just some clicks. We have saved time writing adverts particularly, and the power to create a tone of voice has considerably aided on this.”
– Anyword Evaluation, Ren H, Digital Copyeditor.
What I dislike about Anyword:
- The interface is comparatively much less intuitive and has a studying curve.
- Its pricing, beginning with $49 a month, could also be unsuitable for people or smaller companies.
What G2 customers dislike about Anyword:
“Anyword generally generates the mistaken factor, and I’ve to repair up the immediate so it could possibly generate it extra precisely. It additionally has a phrase restrict, which makes utilizing it for big blogs very troublesome.”
– Anyword Evaluation, Yousif S., Small-Enterprise.
Comparability of the most effective Grammarly options
Right here’s how Grammarly options differ from Grammarly when it comes to options and pricing.
|
Grammarly different instrument |
Greatest for |
Free model |
Pricing begins at |
|
Semrush |
Search engine optimisation-integrated writing. Rephrasing to enhance the readability of content material. |
Sure (7-day trial) |
$25 per 30 days |
|
ProWritingAid |
Complete modifying. Good for long-form writing. |
Sure |
$30 per 30 days |
|
Writesonic |
Creating various kinds of content material. A number of Search engine optimisation options. |
Sure |
$39 per 30 days |
|
Jasper |
Inventive storytelling and long-form content material. Good for Brainstorming concepts. |
Sure (7-day trial) |
$49 per 30 days |
|
Rytr |
Creating content material for various media. |
Sure |
$9 per 30 days |
|
Pepper Content material |
Information-led content material advertising and marketing and enterprises. |
Sure (Restricted interval) |
$99 per 30 days |
|
Copy.ai |
Copywriting for product pages. Personalization in content material. |
Sure |
$49 per 30 days |
|
Anyword |
Copywriting and integrating model voice in content material. |
Sure (7-day trial) |
$49 per 30 days |
Often requested questions on AI writing assistants and Grammarly options
Listed here are some frequent questions chances are you’ll come throughout whereas evaluating Grammarly options. I’ve answered them based mostly on my expertise.
Q1. What’s the greatest different to Grammarly?
The perfect different to Grammarly depends upon your content material targets. Semrush combines grammar checking with Search engine optimisation instruments, making it preferrred for entrepreneurs. ProWritingAid provides in-depth evaluation for tone and readability. Writesonic helps preserve a constant model voice throughout codecs, whereas Rytr is good for small groups creating content material for a number of platforms.
Q2. What are the most effective free Grammarly options?
Nearly all Grammarly options include a free trial. ProWritingAid provides a free bundle with a 500-word rely restrict. Rytr has a free plan with a ten,000-character restrict per 30 days. Copy.ai comes with a 2,000-word restrict in chat. Nonetheless, instruments like Anyword, Jasper, Writesonic, Semrush, and Pepper Content material include limited-period trials.
Q3. Which AI writing assistants are greatest for companies?
Pepper Content material, Anyword, and Copy.ai are the most effective AI writing assistants appropriate for companies as they provide content material creation instruments for a number of channels.
This autumn. That are the most effective Search engine optimisation AI writing assistants?
Semrush hyperlinks its Search engine optimisation and key phrase analysis instruments with the writing assistant, making it a one-stop resolution for Search engine optimisation content material writing. Instruments like Jasper and Writesonic additionally provide a number of Search engine optimisation capabilities to boost content material creation.
Q5. Is ChatGPT higher than Grammarly?
Grammarly is healthier for refining writing, with instruments for checking grammar, tone, and construction. ChatGPT, as a generalist AI instrument, is healthier for brainstorming, outlining, researching, and producing content material from scratch.
Past grammar checks
After attempting out these options, it’s clear that though Grammarly received there first, it’s not the one viable choice. Choose the one that matches your funds, enterprise targets, scaling technique, and goal.
What’s thrilling is how rapidly this house is evolving. Instruments have gotten extra intuitive, higher at understanding tone, and eventually studying that “good grammar” doesn’t at all times imply “good writing.”
My stance? Writing assistants provide a handy set off for creativity and thought. But lending a private contact, fact-checking, and guaranteeing the alignment of the content material generated with firm targets stays the protect of human customers.
With these options, you’ll be able to test-drive a brand new instrument, determine what clicks, and select the one which helps you say what you actually imply.
AI video turbines have touched a UX plateau and are struggling to scale past simplicity. Be taught why in our current article based mostly on an evaluation of 1,200+ consumer opinions.
