My Analysis of 6 Greatest Third-Celebration Threat Administration Software program

A vendor will get breached. You discover out two weeks later. Now you are caught answering to management with nothing however an outdated spreadsheet and a half-finished threat rating.No one desires that. That’s why I evaluated over 15 platforms to search out the finest third-party threat administration (TPRM) software program for 2025: instruments that detect points early, automate assessments, and preserve vendor threat underneath management with out chasing paperwork.

And the information backs its use case. Based on the 2025 Venminder State of Third-Celebration Threat Administration Survey, 87% of organizations imagine there’s worth in investing in TPRM actions. Moreover, 64% are already utilizing devoted platforms to do it. That type of consensus exhibits how vital these instruments have turn out to be for threat, compliance, and procurement groups alike.

The six platforms that made this checklist stood out for his or her automation, versatile frameworks, and skill to assist all the things from safety audits to procurement-led critiques. Whether or not you’re dealing with 20 distributors or 200, these instruments are constructed that will help you keep compliant with out slowing the enterprise down.

What makes third-party threat administration software program price it?

Threat doesn’t cease after onboarding. A vendor may move the preliminary checks however fall out of compliance six months later, and should you don’t catch it, your group is on the hook.

That’s what makes third-party threat administration software program definitely worth the funding. It’s not nearly organizing vendor knowledge; it’s about staying knowledgeable. The precise platform helps you notice adjustments in vendor threat early, automate follow-ups, and keep away from surprises throughout audits or board critiques.

It additionally saves time. As a substitute of chasing standing updates throughout departments, TPRM software program provides you a shared system for assessments, scoring, and approvals. Meaning fewer delays, clearer accountability, and fewer room for issues to slide by the cracks.

What I prioritized when evaluating third-party vendor threat administration software program 

Not each platform that claims to handle vendor threat is constructed for the real-world stress that comes with it. I thought of the next components when evaluating one of the best third-party threat administration software program.

• Steady threat monitoring: It’s not sufficient to evaluate a vendor as soon as and transfer on. I regarded for TPRM platforms that supply ongoing visibility. Instruments that observe adjustments in a vendor’s safety posture, monetary well being, or compliance standing and set off alerts when one thing shifts had been excessive on my checklist.
• Automated assessments and follow-ups: Questionnaires are unavoidable, however they shouldn’t be a bottleneck. I prioritized platforms that allow you to automate preliminary assessments, ship reminders, and rating distributors based mostly on pre-set standards. This helps groups transfer quicker whereas nonetheless documenting all the things for audit readiness.
• Integration with compliance frameworks: Whether or not you are managing GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, or ISO 27001, mapping vendor knowledge to compliance controls is vital. I regarded for instruments that supply native assist for widespread frameworks or make it straightforward to construct your personal mapping system.
• Threat scoring and tiering flexibility: Not all distributors carry the identical threat, and your software program ought to mirror that. I gave desire to TPRM instruments that enable for configurable scoring fashions, tiering logic, and conditional workflows based mostly on vendor kind, geography, or service criticality.
• Collaboration and possession monitoring: Vendor threat isn’t owned by one group. I regarded for platforms that assist cross-functional collaboration between procurement, safety, authorized, and compliance, with clear process possession and standing visibility in-built.
• Scalability and usefulness: The most effective third-party threat administration platforms include clear interfaces, customizable dashboards, and versatile deployment fashions that may assist small groups or scale with rising vendor ecosystems.

The checklist under accommodates real person critiques from the Third-party & Provider Threat Administration Software program class web page. To be included on this class, an answer should:

• Embody commonplace workflows and templates to evaluate and consider a variety of third-party dangers, together with monetary, authorized, strategic, reputational, moral, data safety, operational, cybersecurity, environmental, and geopolitical dangers
• Embody commonplace stories on third-party threat publicity
• Remediate third-party dangers in alignment with inside insurance policies
• Monitor ongoing vendor efficiency and any third-party threat adjustments

*This knowledge was pulled from G2 in 2025. Some critiques could have been edited for readability.

UpGuard is a third-party threat administration platform that helps organizations monitor and consider vendor safety posture at scale. Based on G2 Knowledge, it’s mostly utilized in monetary companies, IT companies, and software program, with nearly all of customers coming from mid-market (37%) and enterprise (55%) firms.

Certainly one of UpGuard’s mostly talked about advantages is the visibility it supplies into vendor safety. Reviewers mentioned the platform helped them keep forward of vulnerabilities by highlighting expired certificates, DNS points, and different potential exposures throughout their provide chain. This made it simpler to evaluate which distributors posed essentially the most threat and required speedy consideration.

UpGuard’s automated threat scoring was one other standout. A number of customers appreciated that the instrument might rapidly consider and rank distributors based mostly on exterior threat alerts, making it simpler to prioritize their evaluate course of. Groups managing a big quantity of distributors discovered this particularly invaluable throughout onboarding and periodic reassessments.

Buyer assist additionally earned constant reward. Many G2 customers described the assist group as responsive, educated, and straightforward to work with. A number of highlighted onboarding experiences the place UpGuard’s group helped information them by implementation and supplied tailor-made recommendation for setup and finest practices.

The interface itself was typically described as intuitive and straightforward to navigate. Reviewers famous that even group members with no technical background might rapidly perceive tips on how to view vendor threat scores and drill into particular points. The readability of the dashboard was regularly highlighted as one of many platform’s high usability strengths.

That mentioned, just a few areas stood out as limitations for some groups. Whereas the built-in questionnaire instrument helped simplify components of the evaluation course of, a number of reviewers discovered it restrictive when making an attempt to tailor inquiries to particular distributors or compliance necessities. The dearth of flexibility created further work in instances the place customized inputs had been wanted, although groups working standardized assessments appeared much less affected.

Customization additionally got here up as a typical request. Some customers needed extra management over how threat scores had been calculated or how notifications had been configured for various threat occasions. The built-in scoring logic labored effectively for basic vendor critiques, however groups in extremely regulated industries or with distinctive threat fashions discovered themselves wishing for extra flexibility. Nonetheless, most agreed that the default setup supplied a strong basis for monitoring exterior threat throughout a rising vendor base.

UpGuard is a robust match for mid-market and enterprise groups that need exterior threat monitoring and clear visibility into third-party safety posture, with out sacrificing ease of use or assist high quality.

What I dislike about UpGuard:

• Whereas the instrument was useful for standardized workflows, some G2 customers felt the questionnaire module didn’t provide sufficient flexibility when making an attempt to customise assessments for various vendor tiers.
• With customization, reviewers needed extra flexibility in configuring alerts, scoring logic, and workflows. That mentioned, most felt the out-of-the-box setup nonetheless gave them a strong basis to scale vendor threat applications successfully.

What G2 customers dislike about UpGuard:

“What we dislike presently with UpGuard is the limitation to have a number of relationship questionnaires. As a corporation that has a number of enterprise models, we considered an alternate for now to proceed with the implementation.”

– UpGuard Evaluation, Ghel E.

Vanta is broadly recognized for its governance, safety, and compliance (GRC) automation capabilities. Whereas it isn’t constructed solely for vendor threat administration, many G2 customers depend on it to carry third-party visibility into their compliance applications. Based on G2 Knowledge, Vanta is mostly utilized by small companies (50%) and mid-market firms (48%), with adoption concentrated in software program, IT companies, and monetary companies.

Reviewers regularly highlighted Vanta’s automation capabilities. Duties like vendor discovery, proof assortment, doc evaluation, and threat scoring might all be dealt with with minimal guide enter. Vanta AI performed a giant position right here, serving to groups save time by responding to safety questions and triggering follow-ups mechanically.

The questionnaire builder additionally earned reward for dashing up assessments. Some groups used the built-in templates, whereas others most well-liked crafting their very own kinds. In both case, reviewers felt the instrument made it simpler to get the correct solutions rapidly when evaluating distributors throughout completely different threat tiers.

Usability stood out as one other sturdy level. Many reviewers described the interface as clear and intuitive, permitting each technical and non-technical stakeholders to collaborate on duties like vendor critiques, compliance checks, and audit prep while not having fixed assist.

Moreover, Vanta’s rising community of Belief Facilities helped customers confirm first-party knowledge immediately from their distributors, making it simpler to validate safety claims, minimize down on back-and-forth, and keep a extra correct, up-to-date view of third-party threat.

Most reviewers felt Vanta supplied strong worth out of the field, particularly for core compliance wants. That mentioned, pricing got here up as a sticking level for some. A couple of customers famous that superior options, like enhanced vendor workflows or added automation, required higher-tier plans, which might stretch budgets for smaller groups. Even so, the truth that half of Vanta’s G2 reviewers come from small companies means that many groups nonetheless discover the platform accessible and definitely worth the funding.

Integrations drew some blended reactions. Whereas customers appreciated the variety of out there connectors, just a few talked about that setup wasn’t at all times plug-and-play and generally wanted further assist. As soon as configured, although, most discovered the integrations reliable for syncing audit and vendor knowledge.

Regardless of these gaps, most agreed that Vanta supplied a robust basis for scaling vendor compliance, significantly for firms rising their GRC capabilities alongside third-party oversight.

What I dislike about Vanta:

• Whereas many customers discovered long-term worth in Vanta’s automation, some felt the pricing was a bit steep for smaller groups simply getting began.
• The vary of integrations was appreciated, however just a few reviewers mentioned the preliminary setup wasn’t as easy as they anticipated and sometimes wanted further assist.

What G2 customers dislike about Vanta:

“Whereas Vanta simplifies core compliance duties, we’d prefer to see deeper remediation steerage, extra intuitive assist for vendor threat monitoring, and expanded metrics for govt reporting. Enhancing cross-framework mapping and providing higher controls for AI coverage governance would additionally enhance its long-term worth.”

– Vanta Evaluation, Rajat R.

Descartes Denied Celebration Screening helps organizations display screen suppliers, companions, and different third events towards international watchlists to remain compliant with commerce rules. Based mostly on G2 Knowledge, it’s most generally utilized in extremely regulated industries like aviation, aerospace, and protection, with 32% of reviewers from mid-market firms and 52% from enterprise organizations.

One of the constant strengths reviewers talked about is the platform’s screening accuracy. Many customers mentioned Descartes made it simpler to vet suppliers towards denied celebration lists and international sanctions databases, serving to them reduce threat throughout onboarding or ongoing due diligence.

This accuracy was additional amplified by automation. As a substitute of manually monitoring entries throughout a number of lists, customers described how Descartes runs steady background checks that flag potential dangers with out disrupting workflows. For groups managing giant vendor volumes, this automated screening helped scale back errors whereas saving important time.

Actual-time alerts had been one other recurring spotlight. A number of customers famous how rapidly the system flagged dangers, giving compliance and commerce groups sufficient time to reply earlier than a transaction progressed. And with built-in ERP and commerce system integrations, Descartes was capable of ship these alerts as a part of customers’ present workflows.

Assist additionally earned reward. Many famous that the group was fast to help with configuration questions and helped customers confidently navigate the extra complicated facets of denied celebration screening.

Having mentioned that, just a few reviewers identified that false positives had been a recurring problem. In some instances, overly delicate matching logic triggered pointless investigations, particularly when working with international entities that had related names. Nonetheless, customers appreciated that match rule thresholds could possibly be fine-tuned with assist from assist to scale back these occurrences.

A couple of others talked about that the interface felt dated and could possibly be extra intuitive for first-time customers, although they acknowledged that when the system was configured, it ran easily with minimal intervention.

Descartes Denied Celebration Screening is a robust match for compliance and threat groups in regulated industries who want dependable watchlist protection, responsive assist, and automatic screening workflows to reduce third-party publicity.

What I dislike about Descartes Denied Celebration Screening:

• Some G2 reviewers famous that the instrument often returned false positives, which added just a few further steps to their evaluate course of.
• Others talked about that whereas the interface received the job achieved, it felt barely dated in comparison with newer platforms.

What G2 customers dislike about Descartes Denied Celebration Screening:

“The convenience of use is the place it nonetheless lags. The interface feels outdated, and it’s not at all times clear the place to go for sure features except you’re utilizing it day by day. Since our group makes use of it just a few occasions per week quite than day by day, we frequently discover ourselves re-learning steps or referring again to inside notes. Whereas implementation assist was respectable, the onboarding documentation might’ve been clearer. Buyer assist is mostly useful and responsive, although it generally takes a follow-up to get an in depth reply.”

– Descartes Denied Celebration Screening Evaluation, Shane D.

Secureframe is finest recognized for serving to groups keep audit-ready, however G2 customers additionally depend on it to handle vendor threat extra confidently. Based on G2 Knowledge, Secureframe is primarily adopted by small companies (65%) and mid-market firms (31%), mostly in laptop science, IT companies, and monetary companies.

From what I gathered in critiques, one among Secureframe’s most appreciated options is its centralized vendor dashboard. Customers talked about having the ability to entry all the things from vendor profiles and evaluation outcomes to connected paperwork and historical past logs in a single tab. For groups managing a number of distributors, this visibility appeared to make a giant distinction.

I additionally noticed plenty of reward for the platform’s steady monitoring capabilities. A number of customers highlighted how Secureframe helps flag unapproved companies accessed by way of SSO, catching shadow IT distributors earlier than they slip by the cracks. Many additionally talked about organising recurring vendor critiques, tiered by threat stage, with duties and notifications routed by instruments like Slack and Jira. That automation felt significantly invaluable for fast-moving groups making an attempt to maintain up with coverage checks.

One other characteristic that stood out was Comply AI, which helps extract related responses immediately from vendor paperwork like SOC 2 stories or safety insurance policies. The platform then pre-fills safety questionnaires with instructed solutions, giving groups a head begin on vendor evaluations whereas saving hours on guide critiques.

Ease of use got here up regularly as effectively. Reviewers throughout technical and non-technical roles mentioned Secureframe made it straightforward to navigate audits, assessments, and vendor workflows while not having in depth onboarding. I additionally noticed a number of mentions of a useful and responsive assist group, which added to the general ease of adoption.

That mentioned, just a few G2 customers famous restricted flexibility in vendor administration workflows, significantly when making an attempt to tailor processes for various provider tiers. Others wished the questionnaire module supplied extra customization choices, like dynamic scoring or conditional logic, to higher match complicated threat necessities. Nonetheless, most reviewers felt Secureframe supplied a strong basis for vendor threat monitoring, particularly for groups earlier of their third-party governance journey.

When you’re searching for an accessible but succesful TPRM answer that mixes automation, AI assist, and ongoing monitoring, Secureframe is price contemplating.

What I dislike about Secureframe:

• Some G2 reviewers felt the questionnaire module was a little bit inflexible, particularly when customizing assessments for various vendor sorts.
• A couple of G2 critiques additionally talked about restricted flexibility in how vendor workflows had been structured and managed.

What G2 customers dislike about Secureframe:

“Though the platform addresses nearly all of our necessities, the sheer variety of options could be a bit daunting initially. It might be useful if there have been a neater approach to prioritize or cover options that are not wanted, as this might make it simpler for brand spanking new customers to rise up to hurry extra rapidly.”

– Secureframe Evaluation, Bryan R.

IBM OpenPages is an enterprise-grade GRC platform that features strong assist for third-party threat administration. Based on G2 Knowledge, it’s mostly adopted in industries like laptop software program, IT companies, and monetary companies, with most customers coming from small (37%) and mid-sized companies (43%).

A number of reviewers appreciated how configurable the platform was relating to vendor threat processes. I learn in critiques that groups had been capable of adapt workflows to match their very own inside insurance policies, regulatory wants, and most well-liked scoring methodologies. This flexibility prolonged into how customers tracked threat severity, mitigation plans, and associated points throughout vendor relationships, permitting for extra detailed threat modeling with out forcing a one-size-fits-all construction.

OpenPages helps groups handle the complete vendor questionnaire course of in a single place, from creating assessments to sending reminders and reviewing responses. A number of customers mentioned this diminished the guide back-and-forth and made it simpler to remain constant throughout distributors. The power to attain responses additionally supplied groups with a clearer approach to consider third-party threat and resolve who to work with.

One other key theme I observed was how helpful the reporting and dashboard options had been for large-scale visibility. Some customers mentioned they may group distributors by geography, tier, or enterprise unit, which made it simpler to identify patterns or examine particular points. This was useful for firms dealing with many third events, the place having a centralized view of vendor hierarchies and threat metrics made oversight less complicated.

By way of technical functionality, OpenPages was additionally famous for its integrations. It will probably join with each enterprise and exterior techniques to drag in vendor knowledge, serving to consolidate third-party data right into a unified repository. That consolidation gave customers a clearer image of their whole vendor panorama and improved effectivity in areas like onboarding and efficiency monitoring.

The educational curve did come up as a tradeoff in a number of critiques. Whereas G2 customers valued the platform’s depth, they famous that it required some ramp-up time, particularly for these with out prior expertise in threat or compliance techniques. Regardless of that, most agreed the trouble was worthwhile as soon as groups turned acquainted with the system.

Pricing was one other space the place opinions various barely. A couple of reviewers discovered the associated fee to be comparatively excessive for smaller groups. Even so, it appears many firms continued to depend on OpenPages for its long-term scalability and the extent of management it affords for vendor threat administration.

When you’re seeking to construct a mature, centralized program for monitoring vendor threat, IBM OpenPages affords a excessive diploma of customization, sturdy technical integrations, and assist for complicated third-party governance.

What I dislike about IBM OpenPages:

• Some critiques famous that getting in control might take time, primarily for groups new to GRC platforms. That mentioned, most agreed the pliability and depth made the educational worthwhile as soon as they received going.
• A couple of customers famous that the pricing felt a little bit excessive in comparison with how typically they used the platform. Nonetheless, many felt the worth aligned effectively with the capabilities supplied.

What G2 customers dislike about IBM OpenPages:

“The fee is excessive as in comparison with different GRC instruments, and there are some hurdles in person adoption.”

– IBM OpenPages Evaluation, Vishal D. 

D&B Threat Analytics allows groups to guage provider threat and make extra knowledgeable choices utilizing a mixture of proprietary knowledge and built-in workflows. Based on G2 Knowledge, the platform is used most frequently by professionals in IT companies, accounting, and insurance coverage, spanning small companies (25%) to enterprise groups (36%), with the biggest phase coming from mid-market firms (38%).

What stood out to me within the critiques was how a lot customers valued the entry to deep provider intelligence. Many mentioned the platform gave them the type of monetary and operational perception they couldn’t simply discover elsewhere: AI-driven proprietary threat scores, UNSPSC, parent-child data, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG).

Talking of the platform’s skill to determine provider dangers and AI-generated threat scores, the instrument additionally affords SER, SSI, and PAYDEX as key sources for detecting pink flags and rating distributors by publicity ranges. Such a intelligence is especially invaluable for groups managing giant provider networks.

One other typically praised characteristic is the platform’s automated screening workflows. As a substitute of counting on guide processes, customers described a guided, five-step process that helps determine high-risk suppliers by checking sanctions lists, hostile media, and extra. A couple of reviewers additionally highlighted enhanced screening choices like Final Useful Possession (UBO) knowledge, which supplies an extra layer of element when vetting complicated provider relationships.

G2 customers additionally talked about how straightforward it was to get began with the platform. I got here throughout a number of mentions of quick implementation and minimal technical raise. It appeared like customers had been capable of arrange monitoring, configure dashboards, and begin monitoring threat with little or no hand-holding. One thing I think about is a big plus for stretched procurement or threat groups.

I additionally noticed belief within the knowledge. Many reviewers mentioned the depth and accuracy of D&B’s international database made them really feel extra ready throughout provider critiques and audits. Some talked about that having alerts and monitoring tied to real-time knowledge helped them catch points, like credit score dips or authorized pink flags, earlier than they turned actual issues.

That mentioned, some G2 customers identified challenges with knowledge protection in sure areas, significantly in rising markets. I learn that provider profiles for personal or newer companies had been typically sparse or lacking altogether. In some instances, customers reported false positives or duplicate entries that made it tougher to belief the automated flags. These limitations didn’t outweigh the advantages for many groups, however they did spotlight the significance of cross-checking insights earlier than taking motion.

Some reviewers additionally mentioned that pricing felt a bit excessive, significantly for smaller groups. Even so, the platform nonetheless appears to strike a very good stability, with customers throughout completely different firm sizes discovering worth in its capabilities.

D&B Threat Analytics is a robust possibility for firms that need dependable provider knowledge, quick implementation, and a platform that scales with threat and procurement wants.

What I dislike about D&B Threat Analytics:

• Some customers famous that provider knowledge was extra restricted in sure areas, primarily for rising markets, however nonetheless discovered the platform dependable for almost all of their vendor base.
• A couple of reviewers talked about that the pricing could possibly be a stretch for smaller groups or occasional use instances, although many nonetheless felt the platform delivered sturdy worth total.

What G2 customers dislike about D&B Threat Analytics:

“Whereas I haven’t got private opinions, some customers may need issues with D&B Threat Analytics, similar to excessive prices, a steep studying curve because of its complexity, potential over-reliance on knowledge, restricted protection in sure industries or areas, and challenges with integration into present techniques.”

– D&B Threat Analytics Evaluation, Abhishek Kumar Y.

When you’re considering past vendor threat, right here’s our information to the finest GRC instruments to finish the image.