Anthropic has launched Claude Opus 4.6, its most succesful mannequin so far, targeted on long-context reasoning, agentic coding, and high-value information work. The mannequin builds on Claude Opus 4.5 and is now accessible on claude.ai, the Claude API, and main cloud suppliers beneath the ID claude-opus-4-6.
Mannequin focus: agentic work, not single solutions
Opus 4.6 is designed for multi-step duties the place the mannequin should plan, act, and revise over time. As per the Anthropic group, they use it in Claude Code and report that it focuses extra on the toughest elements of a job, handles ambiguous issues with higher judgment, and stays productive over longer periods.
The mannequin tends to suppose extra deeply and revisit its reasoning earlier than answering. This improves efficiency on tough issues however can improve value and latency on easy ones. Anthropic exposes a /effort parameter with 4 ranges — low, medium, excessive (default), and max — so builders can explicitly commerce off reasoning depth towards velocity and value per endpoint or use case.
Past coding, Opus 4.6 targets sensible knowledge-work duties:
- working monetary analyses
- doing analysis with retrieval and shopping
- utilizing and creating paperwork, spreadsheets, and displays
Inside Cowork, Anthropic’s autonomous work floor, the mannequin can run multi-step workflows that span these artifacts with out steady human prompting.
Lengthy-context capabilities and developer controls
Opus 4.6 is the primary Opus-class mannequin with a 1M token context window in beta. For prompts above 200k tokens on this 1M-context mode, pricing rises to $10 per 1M enter tokens and $37.50 per 1M output tokens. The mannequin helps as much as 128k output tokens, which is sufficient for very lengthy stories, code opinions, or structured multi-file edits in a single response.
To make long-running brokers manageable, Anthropic ships a number of platform options round Opus 4.6:
- Adaptive pondering: the mannequin can determine when to make use of prolonged pondering based mostly on job problem and context, as an alternative of at all times working at most reasoning depth.
- Effort controls: 4 discrete effort ranges (low, medium, excessive, max) expose a clear management floor for latency vs reasoning high quality.
- Context compaction (beta): the platform robotically summarizes and replaces older elements of the dialog as a configurable context threshold is approached, decreasing the necessity for customized truncation logic.
- US-only inference: workloads that should keep in US areas can run at 1.1× token pricing.
These controls goal a typical real-world sample: agentic workflows that accumulate lots of of hundreds of tokens whereas interacting with instruments, paperwork, and code over many steps.
Product integrations: Claude Code, Excel, and PowerPoint
Anthropic has upgraded its product stack in order that Opus 4.6 can drive extra practical workflows for engineers and analysts.
In Claude Code, a brand new ‘agent groups’ mode (analysis preview) lets customers create a number of brokers that work in parallel and coordinate autonomously. That is aimed toward read-heavy duties similar to codebase opinions. Every sub-agent may be taken over interactively, together with through tmux, which inserts terminal-centric engineering workflows.
Claude in Excel now plans earlier than performing, can ingest unstructured knowledge and infer construction, and may apply multi-step transformations in a single go. When paired with Claude in PowerPoint, customers can transfer from uncooked knowledge in Excel to structured, on-brand slide decks. The mannequin reads layouts, fonts, and slide masters so generated decks keep aligned with present templates. Claude in PowerPoint is at the moment in analysis preview for Max, Workforce, and Enterprise plans.
Benchmark profile: coding, search, long-context retrieval
Anthropic group positions Opus 4.6 as state-of-the-art on a number of exterior benchmarks that matter for coding brokers, search brokers, {and professional} resolution assist.
Key outcomes embrace:
- GDPval-AA (economically invaluable information work in finance, authorized, and associated domains): Opus 4.6 outperforms OpenAI’s GPT-5.2 by round 144 Elo factors and Claude Opus 4.5 by 190 factors. This means that, in head-to-head comparisons, Opus 4.6 beats GPT-5.2 on this analysis about 70% of the time.
- Terminal-Bench 2.0: Opus 4.6 achieves the best reported rating on this agentic coding and system job benchmark.
- Humanity’s Final Examination: on this multidisciplinary reasoning check with instruments (net search, code execution, and others), Opus 4.6 leads different frontier fashions, together with GPT-5.2 and Gemini 3 Professional configurations, beneath the documented harness.
- BrowseComp: Opus 4.6 performs higher than another mannequin on this agentic search benchmark. When Claude fashions are mixed with a multi-agent harness, scores improve to 86.8%.
Lengthy-context retrieval is a central enchancment. On the 8-needle 1M variant of MRCR v2 — a ‘needle-in-a-haystack’ benchmark the place info are buried inside 1M tokens of textual content — Opus 4.6 scores 76%, in comparison with 18.5% for Claude Sonnet 4.5. Anthropic describes this as a qualitative shift in how a lot context a mannequin can really use with out context rot.
Further efficiency beneficial properties in:
- root trigger evaluation on complicated software program failures
- multilingual coding
- long-term coherence and planning
- cybersecurity duties
- life sciences, the place Opus 4.6 performs nearly 2× higher than Opus 4.5 on computational biology, structural biology, natural chemistry, and phylogenetics evaluations
On Merchandising-Bench 2, a long-horizon financial efficiency benchmark, Opus 4.6 earns $3,050.53 greater than Opus 4.5 beneath the reported setup.
Key Takeaways
- Opus 4.6 is Anthropic’s highest-end mannequin with 1M-token context (beta): Helps 1M enter tokens and as much as 128k output tokens, with premium pricing above 200k tokens, making it appropriate for very lengthy codebases, paperwork, and multi-step agentic workflows.
- Express controls for reasoning depth and value through effort and adaptive pondering: Builders can tune
/effort(low, medium, excessive, max) and let ‘adaptive pondering’ determine when prolonged reasoning is required, exposing a transparent latency vs accuracy vs value trade-off for various routes and duties. - Robust benchmark efficiency on coding, search, and financial worth duties: Opus 4.6 leads on GDPval-AA, Terminal-Bench 2.0, Humanity’s Final Examination, BrowseComp, and MRCR v2 1M, with massive beneficial properties over Claude Opus 4.5 and GPT-class baselines in long-context retrieval and tool-augmented reasoning.
- Tight integration with Claude Code, Excel, and PowerPoint for actual workloads: Agent groups in Claude Code, structured Excel transformations, and template-aware PowerPoint era place Opus 4.6 as a spine for sensible engineering and analyst workflows, not simply chat.
Take a look at the Technical particulars and Documentation. Additionally, be at liberty to observe us on Twitter and don’t overlook to affix our 100k+ ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Publication. Wait! are you on telegram? now you possibly can be a part of us on telegram as effectively.
Max is an AI analyst at MarkTechPost, based mostly in Silicon Valley, who actively shapes the way forward for expertise. He teaches robotics at Brainvyne, combats spam with ComplyEmail, and leverages AI each day to translate complicated tech developments into clear, comprehensible insights
